Pets in the US are too fat. Why? Two reasons: They exercise almost as much a we do (dream-running does not count), and they eat too much of the crap we give them. Not that pet food or "human food" is necessarily bad for them. "Crap," used here, infers simply that we tend not to think much when we feed our pets. Instead, we tend to feel when we feed them. In our culture, food is love and indolence is prized. Therefore, most pets are fat simply because they are as loved and treasured as we'd like to be.
While I respect these sentiments (and suffer from them occasionally), I despise their results. Here are a few reasons why:
1. Fat pets move less—they tend towards extreme indolence, which makes them less playful and, because play is fun, obese animals are usually less happy. Moreover, unless Fluffy’s family is also indolent, Fluffy becomes less integrated into the fold than she might otherwise be: fewer trips to the beach, runs in the park, etc.—so Fluffy grows ever plumper.
2. Big, fat pets (like large breed dogs or extremely overweight cats) are so predisposed to painful arthritis and subsequent premature euthanasia (due to immobility) it should be a crime to permit their obesity. To some minds, imposed obesity is de facto negligence. Yes—it is true that some owners cannot control this any more than they can control their own weight (for reasons psychological and/or physical)—but it’s still very sad.
3. Fat cats, in particular, are predisposed to a terrible condition called fatty liver disease. Unfortunate name, this, but very descriptive, nonetheless. When fat cats get sick, even with something as potentially minor as constipation, you know they’re feeling yucky because they don’t eat much. Not eating much means their fat little bodies must now metabolize the abundant fat to keep it going. By some quirk in their metabolism the fat gets processed by the liver and stays there. Next thing you know your cat has yellow skin and you’re well into $2K in vet bills. Here’s a pretty picture you can view before you go out for lunch. Yum.
4. Fat pets unnecessarily stress all their internal organs, potentially causing or intensifying any cardiac or circulatory disease, in particular.
5. Fat pets don’t breathe as well. The fat around their neck strangles them somewhat. I often hear, but Fluffy has always breathed that way. Think hard: Fluffy has always been fat.
6. Fat pets have a greater tendency towards incontinence. Fat females, especially, suffer this indignity more often. It predisposes them to UTIs and bladder stones.
7. Diagnostics are complicated by fat. Have you ever seen an X-ray of a fat pet? The vet has to look past the folds of fat, often distorting the image, to make a diagnosis. Fat in the blood (lipemia) changes many of the values on a chemistry screen.
8. Surgery, especially abdominal surgery, becomes more traumatic and difficult to perform, increasing the length of the anesthetic procedure and potentially resulting in greater pain on recovery.
9. Fat pets with puncture wounds (especially after crushing injuries such as car accidents and large dog bites) carry a much poorer prognosis. As the fat dies around the injury its infection is difficult to control and becomes a major cause of sepsis (whole body infection).
I’m sure I’ve missed some other reasons why your pet should not be fat. Feel free to include them in your comments to strengthen my arguments.
That’s all for today. Time to put out my cigarette, raid the fridge, and go to bed. Ta-ta.
Add Comment4 Comments
<i>Next thing you know your cat has yellow skin and you’re well into $2K in vet bills.</i>
Uh, yeah... been there, done that. We adopted a cat after her owner died and the cat was so depressed she stopped eating. I doubt that being locked in a bathroom with me, a stranger, and having food forced into her helped her disposition, but she did survive.
We've been pretty lucky with our pets and weight issues. We have two cats whose weight is leaning towards the heavy side, but they trimmed down quite a bit when we took away their kibble and put them on wet food only. The same with our small dogs -- our shih-tzu lost 4 pounds and looks super since we took away her kibble and started to give her canned food. I'd love to see our GSD lose about 5 lbs. or so, as I'd like her to be "lean" and not "normal" because her arthritis is bad. She's been free-fed her entire life, though, so after 10+ years it's hard to convince her to eat in regimented sittings. We have another large dog as well, and it's difficult to make dietary changes for one without affecting the other.
Leigh-Ann August 14th, 2006 12:50:00 AM
The worst thing about having more than one pet is getting used to feeding them differently once this becomes necessary. We suddenly act as if we`re making Sophie`s Choice. Why is this so difficult? We all have this problem to some degree, Leigh-Ann. We assume our pets` only joy in life is being fed. Compensate, then, by petting the one that gets less food as he waits for his skinny sister to polish off her bowl. Petting is almost as much fun as eating, in my experience...;-)
Dr. Patty Khuly August 14th, 2006 11:46:00 AM
The problem may not be guilt, but my desire to maintain peace in the household :) Our GSD and Anatolian are both food possessive (it's the GSD's fault, she's the oldest), and the only cure we've found for this is to free-feed them. They're so good about "grazing" when kibble is just out and available, and they never seem to eat excessively. It's fascinating to watch their food intake change as the seasons change, too. I promise neither dog is remotely overweight or chunky, and their weight has been consistent for years. They each always weigh 5 lbs. more in the winter than in the summer -- you could calibrate a scale on it.
We've tried to just give them portioned food and they won't eat unless they're hungry. If we then withhold food to try to make them hungry, they'll fight over the most stupid things (like the smell of me cooking in the kitchen). Their fights are nasty, requiring antibiotics and stitches, so we try to avoid them at all costs.
The solution which has occurred to me is to start feeding them something else, something they like so much that they'll eat it immediately. A wet/homemade food might accomplish this, but I'm not sure. They're weird dogs. They've eaten dry kibble and dry snacks their entire lives, so if you hand them something soft they don't seem to know it's food.
The vet hasn't told us to have the GSD lose a few pounds, but I know with her arthritis she could benefit from bordering on "skinny". She's 10 and a half now, and on Rimadyl, but still enjoys running in the yard and climbing the stairs.
Leigh-Ann August 14th, 2006 07:26:00 PM
I have struggled with my own weight all my life, but I have never, ever had an unfit or overweight dog. My friend Christie is the same way. Our food issues are legendary, our fight for our own health ongoing. But we both seem perfectly capable of not imposing our issues on our pets.
My dogs exercise every day. They eat better than I do, which is to say no "fast food," but rather a home-prepared diet of fresh, whole and usually organic foods. (Yes, I'm one of THOSE people ... a quasi-BARFer, no kibble for my guys.)
How hard is it to keep weight off a pet? I haven't met a dog or cat yet who can prepare meals for themselves. I don't get it.
Gina August 19th, 2006 11:56:00 PM
Add Commment