Friday. What a sorry end-of-the-week experience I`ve just had. Fridays, as usual, never fail to disappoint. After waiting nearly 45 minutes (after-hours) for my emergency patient, he arrives. Covered in blood and saliva, Huey makes a spectacular entrance.
Huey is a long-haired housecat of seventeen years. He’s lived a long, indoor life of endless naps, frequent pettings and delicious treats. His adoring parents have known for some weeks, from his emaciated frame and poor appetite, that Huey is not long for this world.
When they first brought him in two weeks ago Huey's family was primarily concerned about his declining appetite and subsequent weight loss. Visual inspection of his oral cavity, however, revealed a nasty infection on one side of his mouth. Examining the edges of the wound and noting exposure of the roots of several teeth, I assumed the worst: squamous cell carcinoma. Almost nothing attacks mucous membranes so violently as this cancer.
Squamous cell tumors are horribly aggressive and usually disfiguring. They affect cats most commonly on their ears, nose and mouth. I see a fair number in dogs as well, though most of these are either oral or nail bed tumors. While they tend not to spread (metastasize) like other tumors, their fierceness and rapid pace are legendary.
The worst part of squamous cell cancers? The inevitable pain, especially in oral forms of the disease. As the tumor rapidly invades the bone of the jaw, the pain becomes intense. Then, because the oral cavity is so bacteria-ridden, tremendous infection ensues. Try to administer oral antibiotics and pain relievers to a cat with severe mouth pain and you’ll know why these tumors are the bane of my existence. It’s excruciating to watch them decline.
Some of these cancers, caught early enough, can be treated with aggressive surgery and/or radiation. Although Huey's case looked far too advanced for definitive treatment, I checked with my local surgeon and internist. As expected, Huey was not a candidate for either approaches mentioned above. The mass was too widespread.
If alleviating the patient’s suffering is the goal, as owners typically profess, then these cats are best euthanized quickly on the heels of this tumor’s discovery. Yet because afflicted cats remain so alert, their owners are typically loath to euthanize them without a fight. In their eyes, the problem is largely one of hygiene. Sticky blood mixed with saliva coats their muzzle, lips, paws, chest, and anywhere else they choose to lick. In advanced stages, they smell like rotting flesh. It’s my job to alert them to the severe pain their cats are concealing and offer euthanasia early on as an alternative to the inevitable suffering.
On this Friday, as always, Huey is a love. He lets me clean him up and examine his mouth again. He purrs and head-butts me as I wipe his mouth. I can understand why his family believes he is not in pain.
Two weeks after his initial [presumptive] diagnosis, Huey`s entire upper and lower jaws are enveloped by eroding, tumorous tissue. His owners had seen the writing on the wall two weeks back and had chosen not to subject him to a surgical biopsy and debridement (removal of dead tissue at a wound site). They had elected daily liquid antibiotics (Clavamox, AKA augmentin) and NSAIDs (Metacam, AKA meloxicam). Obviously, this approach is woefully inadequate for Huey`s advanced disease.
Today the choice is clear: euthanasia is best. Second best? Control the infection by debriding the area (get rid of all those rotting teeth, for starters) and apply fentanyl patches (opiate drug releasing skin patches) every two to three days—in addition to the antibiotics and NSAIDs.
Because Huey`s mother was heading out for a weekend trip to her son’s college, she wanted to wait on the procedure and was iffy about the pain patches. The stress, the need for Dad to come on Monday and every few days thereafter for a patch change, the inevitability of his demise, his apparently high level of comfort, and her unwillingness to cope with his imminent death all contributed to this seemingly unfeeling attitude one might not expect from a loving parent.
Why did you bring him in? I queried softly. Well, because he was bleeding, of course. Obviously, pain was not yet on her emotional radar screen.
Trying hard to maintain control of my emotions, I put it to her like this: You have only two choices at this point. Euthanize him now or let me treat the pain I can assure you he’s feeling. We can deal with his infection later, if you choose, but I can’t—no, I won’t—offer you anything else. You have to understand that he’s in serious pain before we can move on.
Faced with such a strong reaction to her pet’s situation, she might have grabbed her cat and left. But I was lucky. She got it.
I can’t exactly tell an owner she’s being pig-headed and I’d never underestimate the delicacy of her emotional state, but I will do everything in my power to advocate for my patient. I have to break through the denial in some way.
I hate offering ultimatums. It seems so awful to act like I know their cat better than they do. But, in a sense, I do. I know from experience that, properly treated, Huey will continue to live much more comfortably. If he must carry on for their sake, let it require as little suffering as possible.
Some vets might refuse to treat Huey altogether. Go elsewhere, I can’t watch your cat suffer. Others would follow the client’s wishes to the letter. I can’t do either, because sometimes I find myself treating not just the patient, but also the sacred relationship between the patient and his loving (if understandably misguided) family. That means I have to involve myself uncomfortably in the psychology of their experience.
I didn’t get much sleep Friday night. Huey filled my thoughts. I hated being in such a horrible position. End of life care is so sticky and rife with moral ambiguity. Sometimes I wish someone would just hand me a manual—throw me a bone, somebody! What is it I need to do here?
Huey feels better today (Saturday). His fentanyl patch has kicked in and he’s eating well again. His parents are impressed by how much better he looks—they hadn’t realized he’d declined so far. But how long will this last? A week? A few days? Who knows? Maybe he’ll last a month. All I know is that I’ll keep applying that patch and I’ll keep holding their hands as I steer them towards the inevitable.
Add Comment9 Comments
This is so sad. I hope that if this horrible disease ever happens to one of my cats, I'll think of Huey and what you have taught me in this blog post. Rest well,
Rita
Rita October 16th, 2006 06:55:00 AM
Now I'm afraid that I had two cats with mouth cancer and let them live too long. But that's why I come here-to learn how to do better the next time.
Sigh....
heather October 16th, 2006 01:25:00 PM
Let me be a little clearer. All vets are different and all persons deserve to make their own personal decisions regarding the right time for euthanasia. Some clients (and the occasional rare vet) do not believe euthanasia is ever an acceptable option. I try to take this into account when I talk to people. Also, let me stress that I tend towards early euthanasia in cases where the oral cancer is already into the bone or when it`s obviously rapidly growing.
Dr. Patty Khuly October 16th, 2006 03:49:00 PM
I just think I waited to long to euthanize. I didn't realize the pain issues and I suspect my vet didn't realize it either. Quality of life is important to me-even thought I know I'll miss them terribly.
And flashing back to the earlier post about showing the deceased dog's heart to his person-I wouldn't have minded and would have possibly even felt better to know what killed him. I'm just weird that way. Interesting blog!
heather October 17th, 2006 01:45:00 PM
I must sadly admit that I think I waited to long to euthanize my ferret. He was scheduled for surgery to remove what was expected to be a cancerous spleen, but looked so bad late one evening I told my husband to take him in and put him down. The husband refused. I didn't have it in me to force it on him (my own childhood dog had been put down against my wishes and I'm still bitter about it). The next morning the husband called me at work becuase he's finally come to the realization of how bad the ferret really was. I rushed off to meet him at the vet, intending not to leave with a live ferret. But when I got there, he had been given fluids and was perking up. The husband wanted to try the surgery then and there. I reluctantly agreed because, once again, I didn't want to hurt my husband's feelings. When they opened him up the cancer was everywhere and they let him go while under anesthesia.
Ever since then I've been worrying that I waited too long...that maybe he was in pain. I hope not. If the vet had said at any point "He's in pain. In your situation I would euthanize," I would have gone with it. But as it was the vet never said anything like that, and I was too much of a wimp to ask it myself. It might have helped our decision along considerably if our vet had acted like you did with the cat. I would not have gotten angry, rather I would have appreciated the honest input.
Becky October 19th, 2006 03:56:00 PM
So many vets I know won't offer euthanasia for personal reasons of their own. Remember, there's more than one way to look at any situation. You're only hearing my side of it. It's always up to you to decide. Please don't let my opinions get in the way of your own personal decisions.
Dr. Patty Khuly October 21st, 2006 01:44:00 PM
Dr.Khuly, thank you for your blog. I look forward to each new post. I appreciate the insight I feel I am gaining. Whenever I have been forced to find a new vet (only once through dissastifaction with staff, all other times due to a move) one of my biggest priorities is finding a vet that will be honest with me in ALL aspects of my companion's care. I want to be able to ask "what would YOU do if this was your pet?" and know that I will get an honest answer, however painful that might be. I would love to have you as a vet.
Mari Lynn October 22nd, 2006 04:05:00 PM
I don't suppose you're interested in moving your practice to Saint Paul? We could use vets who emotionally invest in their clients like you do. My experience has been -- brilliant, knowledgeable people who obviously know their stuff work here. They treat my dog and take my finances into account, they give my young dog good care -- but . . .
But they have never once asked me how I *feel* about anything. Asking me 'how are you holding up? I know it's been rough, ten days of runny doggie bodily fluids everywhere, and I can tell you're worried. I just want to let you know that there is an end in sight. She's not all that sick, she's getting better, it will be ok. . . ' would be worth the vet's weight in gold for me to hear.
Whitewater January 10th, 2007 12:45:00 AM
I feel I must comment on early euthanasia when cancer is already in the bone. In 1996 our local vets referred my 8 yr. old Shih Tzu to Iowa State University due to a malignancy of the lower left jaw. Surgery removed that portion of the jaw and the dog lived a happy, comfortable life for 8 1/2 more yrs. She remained in great health until her final years when, like all of us, she fought Father Time. Once her quality of life was over and there was nothing good in store for her, she was euthanized.
Each case is different and must be evaluted as such, there are sometimes good outcomes. Because of this experience, I make a generous donation to Iowa State's Companion Animal Fund each year. A picture of Oreo hangs in their waiting room and the last time I looked her story can still be seen on ISU's website.
FYI: I came across this website, while researching the pet food recall. A yr. ago my new Shih Tzu, then not quite 2 yrs. old was hospitalized at ISU for aprox. 10 days with hypercalcemia due to Vitamin D toxicosis. Tests ruled out all the physical conditions that cause hypercalcemia, and the possibility of rodentcides, plant toxicities, etc. were eliminated. (This is a dog that is never off leash outside, goes to work with me at my office, and is seldom even out of my sight.) With research I discovered Royal Canin's recall due to too much vitamin D that took place just months earlier and contacted Hill's Pet Nutrition regarding the matter (she was on a prescription Hill's diet). They denied any involvement. A vet experienced in calcium and vitamin D disorders at Ohio State that I contacted thought it sounded like the Royal Canin cases as well. I did much research on the pet food industry, talked to an assistant manager at a premix / supplement animal feed supplier and learned just how easily mistakes can be made from double batching to mixers going down causing "hot spots" in the food. Hill's touted their feed tests and batch testing, I had little belief in that then, and now with 95 different brands recalled, it seems those tests are of little value.
I have been regularly doing a Google search on dog food recalls for the past year believing it would only be a matter of time before something of this nature occured. Sadly it has.
I won't even tell you what I spent to save Smidgen. Of course the first organ affected with vitamin D toxicosis is the kidneys and she already had a genetic issue regarding the kidneys and liver, (thus the need for the prescription diet) but was doing very well. It was a long haul, but again, thanks to the veterinary profession, she pulled through, has bounced back and is doing well, though her urine is dilute (it was not prior to the D toxicity) indicating there was no doubt further lasting damage to her kidneys. By all outward appearances and blood values she is doing fine and is a vital lively dog, though it remains to be seen what the long term holds in store for her.
And so, I watch this turn of events with the recall with great interest and much sadness. I understand the feelings of loss, hurt, betrayal, guilt and monetary hardship pet owners are experiencing due to this.
Sorry this is turned out to be so long...love your website and blog...keep up the good work.
Dixie Harden March 20th, 2007 10:19:00 PM
Add Commment