Vetcetera Let me tell you a scary story about the blindly pet-obsessed among us

March 8th, 2007  

Add Comment8 Comments

I think for the first since I've started visting your blog, I'm actually speechless...atleast for a minute. I had to wrap my brain around the entire situation before the words would come.

Did anybody act as a whistle-blower about this human doctor that was going to perform this surgery? Either this human doctor was really hard up for cash, or he just wanted to make extra to support his obvious crack habit as why else would a human licensed, practicing physician do that? Did he think he was going to make headlines in all the newspapers claiming his fame to a liver transplant that when bad? Yikes!

How is it that these people can run such a facility in the first place? Does a licensed vet own it? If so, what's the story behind the owner as clearly he/ she has issues as well to even consider allowing such a procedure to be done. I somehow cannot believe that performing a liver transplant was kept a big secret, especially if a majority of the staff are the gossip-y type.

I realise that all states have different laws regarding different things, but here in MA, a person cannot own or operate a animal hospital without being a licensed, practicing vet. The owner can hire as many "managers" as he or she wants, but from a legal stand point as well as insurance, ect, it must be a vet that signs for everything.

The law goes deeper from there. Lets say that a vet buys a clinic and has a spouse, and the owner ( the vet) dies in a car accident. By state law, the spouse cannot acquire that hospital. Instead, they must either find a vet to "take over" the clinic and work in a weird semi- partnership that involves really good attorneys and lots of paperwork, or they must sell the clinic to another licensed, practicing vet.

What's Florida's take on that? Can anybody buy a animal hospital or a veterinary operated facility? If so, I think stories like this would be reason enough to change laws regarding who can purchase and run such a facility.

Did the good vet that had nothing but the best intentions leave the practice of vet medicine all together after this nightmare? If not, I hope he was able to find himself an honest, ethical hospital to practice from.

Sorry for the 20 questions and I give you more credit than you'll ever know. These kinds of stories would keep me awake at night...

Stacy March 8th, 2007 05:42:00 PM

Unbelievable. And this organization exists to help whom? Surely not the animals.

Diane March 8th, 2007 09:14:00 PM

Even though I am shocked by the report of the liver transplant, I am not surprised by the depths some people will go to "save" animals. I worked in wildlife rehah in FL for many years. One center actually paid to have a duck's cataracts repaired by a veterinary opthalomologist. Sure the vet did the work at a reduced rate, but that still took a chunk of money. This center was overcrowded, understaffed, and obviously poorly run. Unfortunately, certain animals at these centers become favorites or poster children and no expense is spared on them. Other, less beloved animals usually suffer because of it. I got fed-up with the games & egos and am no longer working in wildlife rehab!

Susan March 8th, 2007 09:49:00 PM

Stacy: In Florida one does not have to be a vet to own a practice. This is also true in a number of states. The human medical profession is also this permissible throughout the US. Otherwise, publicly traded companies could not exist in the human medical field. Have you ever noticed that there are no corporate hospitals (such as VCA or Banfield) in your state? If they are, it's through a legal loophole I haven't heard about.
Diane: Yes, they actually think they're helping out. But this place is extra-special.
And Susan: I hear these crazy things all the time. One thing is cataract surgery on an endangered sea turtle (done by a local ophthalmologist a few years back) so it could be returned to the wild. Another is squandering rehab resources on "pet projects" not likely to help anyone--often, not even the individual animal is helped. Assuaging consciences and massaging egoes is not what people donate their funds for.

Dr. Patty Khuly March 9th, 2007 10:04:00 AM

Wow. That is so heartbreaking and horrifying I'm not sure which emotion is stronger. That poor, poor, puppy.

It sounds to me like that place exists as a means of fleshing out their profiles in the local country club newsletter--doesn't matter that they aren't helping since appearances are everything. Makes me want to barf!

And instead of using that money to REALLY help, it's wasted on egos.

My cat has acromegaly, yet there are no trials/studies in the U.S. because it's considered so "rare" that the drug companies don't want to fund it (doesn't matter that it really isn't as rare since I personally know of 6 other cats with it). Research into diseases like this could easily be partially funded by private contributions, but instead, that money is dumped into scams and fronts that only cause the animals to pay.

OK, rant over...:)

Carolynn March 9th, 2007 02:36:00 PM

When people are so blind to reality its really quite difficult to know how to respond to them.
It can however sometimes by astonishingly genuine from people who just don't realise until its explained to them.
As I looked at the old hamster cupped in my hand clinging to life with severe breathing difficulties I was asked whether a "heart lung transplant" would save him. It would be unfair to laugh as it was asked in all seriousness and having explained that donors would be a problem and that he wouldn't cope with surgery; even presuming microsurgey to this degree was possible; he was euthanased

jackholly March 10th, 2007 04:42:00 AM

My criteria for any op on my animals is firstly, will it increase their quality of life for a significant period. If it means weeks of agony for a maybe so-so result, it's better all round not to put the animal through it.

On the wildlife side, the centre I work for is lucky nough to have the support of many of the JHB vets. We have the best avian vet, the best reptile guy, the opthalmologist, the hedgehog lady and the buck lady ....etc. All our vets provide us with free services, or if it involves getting access to other people's equipment, they will charge us the minimum.

Our underlying policy is release or euthanase, and the vets work accordingly. So we'd never allow anything to be done that required long-term meds, or further treatment. Sometimes it can be difficult - not so much an issue of a 'favourite' animal, but when a rare species comes in, and we have to justify whether the 3 month cage rest is justified - especially when that would take him past the migration date, and would actually have to become 7 months at least. We have to make quite a few decisions like this, but all along, it has to be with the goal of releasing a viable individual.

Some of the hardest choices are for creatures that have been raised as pets, and who are very imprinted. They have been taught to need human interaction. Often they have been maimed to prevent them from going free. Holding a crow who has had his broken wing set so badly that he will never fly, while he pokes his beak in your ear and croons as you tickle his neck....do we euthenase immediately? Do we put him through the trauma of having his wing rebroken, and the 6 weeks of very painful physio that might or might not let him have enough flight ability to survive? And during this long period, how do we treat him in such a way as to reduce his human bonding, while not being unmercifully cruel to someone who just wants a hug?

jcat March 10th, 2007 04:56:00 AM

jackholly: Good point; some laypeople just don't know. And it goes both ways: Many don't know we do chemo or hip replacements.

jcat: I always love your rehabber's perspective. It's so much more complex for you guys. You must love the challenge.

Dr. Patty Khuly March 10th, 2007 11:37:00 AM

Add Commment

Your Name:

CAPTCHA Verification