There’s a new microchip out there and it’s meant to make your dog smarter, if only because his subcutaneous tissues carry extra information about his health…in a rice-sized grain of silicone-slicked metal.
Schering Plough, one of our industry’s biggest pharmaceutical companies, is the bearer of this new technology. They’ve just bought the Home Again brand of microchip…and they’ve made a few changes, which they announced at yesterday’s lunchtime pizza party in our office:
1-The Home Again microchip reader can now read Avid chips (Halellujah! No more trips to the nearby Avid-reading hospital).
2-The microchip number would now be linked to a pet’s basic health information such as vaccine history and medication requirements—maintained on Shering-Plough’s permanent database via your vet’s database. Should your pet get lost, this info is made immediately available to a shelter or hospital in possession of a reader and handy telephone.
3-The company also takes a more active role in helping you find your pet by faxing area shelters, rescues and hospitals your pet’s picture and basic information. Its website also helps you make fliers to aid in your pet’s recovery.
It all sounds real nice, doesn’t it? And I have no doubt that some owners might like to take advantage of this program, priced at an extra fifteen bucks a year. But our hospital won’t be one of those joining the club of Home Again retailers offering this new service.
Although we like Home Again for its anti-migration technology (the chip supposedly stays put well compared to its Avid counterpart) and we’re gratified to have a new dual reader in our hospital, we have a bit of an issue with how Shering-Plough would link its database to ours.
Not only would they have access to all our microchipped pets’ information, they’d also—effectively—have access to all our patients’ records. Though they say they don’t use this info, what’s to stop them sending us a little note in two months saying they’ll be accessing this info for the good of all pets—and which they’ll ultimately sell to line their pockets or to use for their own research and development?
Data mining is an excellent source of income in online commerce. And I wouldn’t want my clients’ information for sale in any market without their express consent.
Apparently, the folks at Shering-Plough couldn’t understand this. When we questioned them at length about this [obvious] ploy to take over our clients’ information (and charge them for it, to boot!) they treated us like paranoid conspiracy theorists.
Maybe we are a little bit more nervous than most. Perhaps we’ll end up being the lone hold-out in the inexorable drive towards a global dearth of privacy in veterinary medicine. But I don’t care. My patients’ private info, much as I write about them here, is as sacred as that of any human patient—to me, at least.
Add Comment11 Comments
Thank you, thank you! When I started reading this post I was like "oh no, this does not sound good". I'm so happy to hear that you guys decided not to go along with it. It's one of those things that sounds nice on the surface, but I'd rather have my privacy (and my pet's privacy) protected. Nowadays it's way too easy to get information on someone anyway.
Janine April 24th, 2007 10:39:00 AM
I agree--I don't want my (or my dogs') information made available to a third party. I see that information as of dubious value to anyone who found my pets anyway. Hopefully, my dogs would be reunited with me quickly, but if they weren't and were vaccinated again, it wouldn't matter that much. In terms of various medical conditions, many vets would want to do their own baseline lab tests if they weren't the original treating vet, so I don't know how useful it would be to have access to the original records. And if my dogs were really sick, they wouldn't be that likely to get lost! In any case, the value of the records doesn't really outweigh the privacy considerations for me.
Arlene April 24th, 2007 11:44:00 AM
the fine print on the "we'll notify veterinary hospitals and shelters for you" bit is that they'll only notify vets and shelters who are participating in the program. the two most local shelters here? use avid chips.
elegy April 24th, 2007 01:23:00 PM
I have a question about Microchips. I'm not sure if they are right for my situation. I have three cats, all declawed. (Our first cat was declawed when we adopted her - the other two had to be declawed b/c of her - long story) They are indoor cats, HOWEVER, we have a 6ft privacy fence and allow them to go in the backyard under our supervision. In a situation like this, is the microchip worth it vs the discomfort to the animal? One of my girls has some serious "I hate the vet" issues.
ERC April 24th, 2007 05:14:00 PM
Microchips can also be VERY useful if you ever need to prove an animal belongs to you in court. (or in general) Because photos just might not cut it, especially with pets that are purebred or commonly marked. (example: orange tabbys can all look alike) I always recommend them to owners for this very reason.
Marie April 24th, 2007 09:18:00 PM
Another pet owner thanking you for keeping your patients' information private. This one feels soooo sleazy. I will be really annoyed if I find any of my vets allows Shering-Plough access to my data.
kabbage April 25th, 2007 09:23:00 AM
I just chipped 2 new dogs with home agin chips and tried to register them online. I gave up after over one hour. The web site is slow, it won't take my password. All my other dogs were registered with a one time fee, now it's saying there will be a yearly fee of $15!!! I have 6 dogs, counting the 2 new ones. The mail in forms from the chips still are the old forms that say $12.50 for life time. I don't need help printing a poster of my dog if it gets lost, and I can make a phone call to my vet and the local shelter for less then $90 a year. I will be calling them tomorrow and they better honor the lifetime fee or they can come and suck those chips out!!!
Lori April 26th, 2007 03:02:00 AM
What I'm anxiously waiting for is "Lojack for pets" :-) I have several indoor cats who all wear collars and have the exisiting microchips but I've had the occasional "escape" and I always panic as I look around my building looking for my escapee. I won't pay for Lojack for my car but if anyone invents an effective tracking device for our pets - my credit card and I will be THERE!
Maribel May 1st, 2007 11:45:00 PM
There IS a lojack for pets -- see http://www.globalpetfinder.com/
Andrea Elkins June 15th, 2007 02:44:00 PM
In 1981, ed hardy and his wife formed Hardy Marks Publications. In 2004, Christian Bale licensed the rights to produce the high-end Ed Hardy UK line, which is based on Hardy's imagery. Prior to the ed hardy clothing line, Bale was the Head Designer at Von Dutch Originals, which marketed the imagery of Kenny Howard. Don ed hardy, commented, As demand for my artwork continues to skyrocket, I felt it was ed hardy clothing time to take on a partner that could help me manage the demand and opportunities for the ed hardy T-shirts name. Iconix is at the forefront of brand management and clearly has the capabilities to dramatically grow the Ed Hardy UK business. I'm thrilled to have them as a partner. Cheap Ed Hardy are located in everywhere. We also believe that by owning the brand alongside ed hardy clothing, the founder, there will be opportunities to further leverage his iconic name along with his new artwork. Largest selection of Ed Hardy T-Shirts and Ed Hardy here
ed hardy sale October 23rd, 2009 01:47:32 AM
However mean your life is, tiffany jewelry meet it and live it do not shun it and call it hard discount tiffany jewelry unt tiffany jewelry It is not so bad as you are.It looks poorest when you are richest.
tiffany jewelry November 13th, 2009 01:57:05 AM
Add Commment