I’m still waiting to see if they send me a free copy. $24.99 sounds like a lot of money for a game that simulates what I do every day for real. Yet I’m almost intrigued enough to type out my Visa card’s number in my [nearly completed] online form at Macgamestore.com (only a Firefox tab away as I write).
Just last month I blogged about vets being more pop-culture worthy than other professionals—in spite of our poor showing on prime-time TV. I said I’d even consider buying a television if someone developed a show worth watching. But now that Ubisoft’s produced one of those hyper-real, high-def games about us vets, I’m still not so sure I want to invest.
In spite of its great ratings and slick look (you can check out the waiting room and an iguana patient on the Macgamestore site), I worry that I might get sucked in. After all, that’s why I don’t have a TV to begin with—it’s like M&Ms (one is never enough and any more are too many). It would certainly stress me to find I like playing a game more than I enjoy going to work.
In this game, players are supposedly ranked by their ability to render quality care, but I’m not so sure that’s quite possible. It’s hard enough to assess a doctor’s skill in real life—and I seriously doubt any game can discern a quack from a doc.
Still, I want to know how vets are portrayed in virtual life. Are we mere diagnosticians or are we also graded on our creative approaches to patient care? How much medical knowledge must one have in order to score well? Does it matter how the player acts with the pets, as in real life? If you get bitten do you go to the human-doc virtual hospital? Do you lose points? If you give your services away out of extreme [and potentially misplaced] kindness, do you get more points—or less? Are players judged on income or on outcome alone?
Maybe one of you Mac-lovers out there can buy it and review it for me. (It’s still not out for the PC crowd.) Perhaps Ubisoft will read this semi-earnest plea and consider sending me one—gratis. Because they should know—vets who love their work are their best allies…and, potentially, their worst critics.
I’m still waiting for that TV show. But in lieu of TV, I’m willing to consider helping Ubisoft on its 2.0 version. (Just call me, guys, OK?)
Add Comment5 Comments
Probably the game ranks players by the speed at which they find the "correct" diagnosis and prescribe the "correct" treatment, or perhaps the number of mistakes in the process. I'm sure it's like Phoenix Wright (a lawyer game) where there is a "right" answer to every situation, which of course is NOT reality.
zandperl May 13th, 2007 01:32:00 PM
I imagine if anything is wrong, it'll be more damaging than good for you. It may not give you as much information that you are used to, and you have to diagnosis it as one thing, and you would normally think about 6 things, and want more info. Sounds like huge frustration to a real vet to me.
Georg May 13th, 2007 04:28:00 PM
I am a pre-vet student and I LOVE your blog, thanks for updating it so much.
When I saw Petz Vet in Wal-Mart a few weeks ago I bought it right away. Now, I've never been much of a computer game player, they generally don't interest me. So that must be considered in my opinion. I enjoy the Petz Vet because I learn new things, it is not easy to know what to do if you are not a vet. It also has a little animal trivia game through which I have learned alot.
So from a non-vet, its ok. Better than nothing and good for learning. But, its not as though I can't pry myself away from it.
Julia May 13th, 2007 09:51:00 PM
Consider getting a TV just for the HBO shows. That's what we do. It's nice to have something to watch with great story lines and characters. Oh, and we watch the Office, which is hilarious. The rest of it is just crap.
Amy May 14th, 2007 08:50:00 AM
I rent the HBO shows I like (I watch them on the computer). Deadwood's my favorite (but don't hold it against me).
Dr. Patty Khuly May 14th, 2007 09:05:00 AM
Add Commment