Pet Patients Declaw nightmare redux

May 22nd, 2007  

Add Comment6 Comments

I'm glad he'll be okay. I hope he continues to adjust with life without claws.

Georg May 22nd, 2007 09:44:00 AM

<i>The owner? He’s taking it OK, I guess, but he’s hard to read. For the record, I did say I was sorry. I think that always helps owners to accept the situation more readily—regardless of whether some people think you accept blame when you do so.</i>

In recent years, in human medicine, lawyers and doctors have been struggling with the (startling to some lawyers but intuitive to many of the rest of us) that patients and their families are much less likely to sue when A) the doctor or hospital apologizes for the bad outcome, and B) fully explains what happened. Because, except in cases where there are ongoing major medical expenses as a result that the patient or family has no other way to pay, the most common reasons that people sue are that they can't get the answers necessary to understand what happened, or they feel that on top of the injury, they've also been dissed or ignored (frequently augmented by the concern that it might happen again, to someone else.)

Explaining and apologizing, in addition to being the humane thing to do, turns out to also be the sensible, pragmatic thing to do. So tell your lawyer to go have a nice, soothing cup of tea.:)

Lis May 22nd, 2007 09:59:00 AM

It was hard taking my two kittens (6 months) to be declawed. I knew the risk, dangers and pain but there wasn't a choice. The had to be declawed. The vet & I discussed the procedure when they were in for shots and then I scheduled another appointment to discuss the declawing, then scheduled the surgery. They stayed two nights at the vet and were given two pain patches each. When they came home, you wouldn't have known they just had surgery. Within hours of coming home, Opal was climbing to the top of the cat post. They were so young, the adapted immediately.

Our older cat (8 years at the time) was declawed when we adopted her. Declawed but not fixed. I don't think vets should do declaws if the owners are not going to have the animal fixed. It just seems wrong. If you can put your animal through the pain of surgery for your conveneince, the least you can do is have the animal fixed for their own health.

I was upset that the procedure was being done, went and visited them hours after the surgery and the next day and was very greatful they were fine & able to play when they got home.

ERC May 22nd, 2007 05:12:00 PM

No animal HAS to be declawed, let's be real here. You preferred it was declawed for whatever reason and that's fine, but I've never heard of an animal NEEDING to be declawed.

anna August 9th, 2007 12:53:00 PM

Anna: Because I don't declaw very often, the ones I do are usually among the more extreme cases. And they always try alternatives like SoftPaws first. It's either find the cat another home (often a virtual impossibility, as you probably know) or have an immunosuppressed human suffer the potential consequences from a kitten's scratch. Or put the cat outside at let it take its chances in the neighborhood. It's true there are few cats who can't be trained to use a scratching post or tolerate SoftPaws but I'm personally not into "nevers" when it comes to declaws. I've seen too many reasonable exceptions, few though they might be.

Dr. Patty Khuly August 9th, 2007 04:02:00 PM

Declawing.. would I ever NO...having cats for well over 40 years...but my sibling has always had his declawed... much to my horror..

The arguement..is it better to get rid of the animal to certain death or life in a shelter??Far be it from me to be the judge..and in the end.. my cats will retain thier appendages..My brother's rescues live fat "happy" lives..sans claws..I can only educate and suggest..and hope to change ONE person's mind at time..

Dr Patty, thanks..you have my understanding...
# Posted By annonymous | 8/10/07 6:57 AM

anonymous August 10th, 2007 07:03:00 AM

Add Commment

Your Name:

CAPTCHA Verification