Vet School 101 Attack of the killer prostate: benign prostatic enlargement in dogs

June 9th, 2007  

Add Comment7 Comments

We're constantly told that there are many health benefits to neutering our animals. This one should be added to the list when we're educating owners. All four of my animals are rescues and are neutered. And I have never even heard of the problem that you talked about this article. Thanks for sharing this.

Julie June 10th, 2007 11:08:00 AM

I've always had male dogs and none of them have ever had an enlargement of the prostate. If it became medically necessary, of course I would agree to neutering but I will not do it on a "what if" basis.

Now, I realize that you didn't say dogs should be neutered to prevent prostate problems but that's the way people will take it, as witness the first comment in reply. So I had to get my licks in and make the point that what "can" happen isn't going to be what "will" happen to all intact dogs or, in fact, to most of them.

Gil. June 10th, 2007 12:12:00 PM

If clients ask me for pros and cons of neutering, this is the one pro I most commonly allude to (after behavior). But, in and of itself, it's not enough to make a strong case for preemptive neutering. I do make the point, however, that in spite of some treatment options (antibiotics and hormonal-interaction type drugs), all prostatic diseased dogs should be neutered. Yet these are the very clients it's hardest to convince. Imagine having a sick dog, knowing how to cure it, and still demanding that their non-reproductively viable dogs retain their testicles--on principle alone. It's one thing when the dogs are high-end breeders and we need to get a few good freezings out of them before we neuter them. It's quite another to put your dog's life at risk in the face of contravening evidence.

Dr. Patty Khuly June 11th, 2007 09:58:00 AM

I type a lot of rectal exams, cystoscopies, and biopsies of the prostate. This was very interesting to read. Neutering is of course never considered in humans as a treatment.

Georg June 11th, 2007 10:18:00 AM

Actually, I've heard that's not entirely true. A family friend recently underwent a "neuter" as part of the surgical treatment of a nearby cancer. It happens, albeit far less often--for reasons that are both medical and social.

Dr. Patty Khuly June 11th, 2007 11:09:00 AM

"Imagine having a sick dog, knowing how to cure it, and still demanding that their non-reproductively viable dogs retain their testicles--on principle alone."

Have you ever offered them neuticles? ;) I know, I know, but with the recalcitrant ones, it might do the trick.

Gil. June 11th, 2007 12:09:00 PM

I have seen neutering once in a patient, but it was for the cancer and not the BPH.

Of course it sounds prettier for humans. Orchidectomy... let's just give him flowers! ;)

Georg June 12th, 2007 12:49:00 PM

Add Commment

Your Name:

CAPTCHA Verification