I don’t normally talk products on this blog. After all, it’s kind of tacky to wax evangelic on something as pedestrian as a plastic-and-metal fur-defying implement. But this one gets special consideration for its ability to prevent disease—really!
Lest you think I hold stock in this product, let me first disclaim: Neither I nor any member of my friend and family network is affiliated with this tool. It just so happens that I think it’s magnificent for its unparalleled ability to extract undercoat loosies and flyaways that might otherwise end up on your floor—in one form or another.
And here’s where it gets medical: pet hair is not just a home-defiling substance formed of dead cells and keratin. In some cases it’s more notable as a gastrointestinal hazard and/or a dermatological liability than the provenance of glorified dustbunnies.
Hairball vomition, colonic impaction and matted fur-related dermatitis are but a trio of the many possibilities the excess of fur can provoke. While skin ailments are obvious and usually attended to, this is not always so with the common hairball. For some reason, we humans seem to have adopted the view that to be feline is to ingest fur and throw it back up when enough has been internally amassed. But I have another take:
Not only are hairballs truly disgusting (especially when they hit the floor in stool-sized plops of fuzzy food and stomach juice) they’re also uncomfortable, potentially life threatening (though rarely), and don’t exactly paint a splendid picture of feline well being (despite their ubiquity).
And so here enters the Furminator, a mundane tool (manufactured in China for all I know) which serves the dual purpose of shredding loose, unwanted undercoat likely to be ingested (or generate mats) and keeping a modern, pet-owning household from looking like a barnyard.
How it does it I’m not so sure, but its mechanism involves lots of little metal teeth (as in an electric bead-trimmer) which must remain unchipped to remain effective. Whatever the technology, it works wonders. I find myself dragging the thing out every time I’m confronted with an unholy mess of a haircoat or a hairball concern.
Not that I’m trying to sell you anything (Lord knows I sell no Furminators out of our hospital), it’s just that every once in a while I feel the need to help solve the most ordinary issues in vet medicine.
And who knows? Perhaps our friend the Furminator has already saved lives through its ability to prevent the dreaded feline trichobezoar. Short of that, it may well be in a position to save marriages when shedding season really gets going.
Add Comment15 Comments
Why are people so obsessed with this product? The idea isn't new. As a matter of fact, shed blades have been around for many years, work just as well and cost half of the "Furminator".
I think people pay into this "wonderful" tool just because it has the word fur in the name. It's like Nestles selling Frosty Paws. What is a Frosty Paw? Colored water with flavoring added to it { I have inside sources for this information} and people spend $4.00 for a tiny container of them.
Geez! If people really want to blow $30.00 on something called the "Furminator" that's fine, but this isn't a magical thing. Regular grooming completely eliminates the need for it.
Stacy September 30th, 2007 10:59:00 AM
The Zoom Groom works just as well as the Furminator on short haired dogs and costs about $6. Since I have no experience with breeds who have long hair or an undercoat, I can't say if the Zoom Groom works as well on them. So maybe the Furminator is top dog in that case.
Great Dane Addict September 30th, 2007 11:51:00 AM
Well, I admit I tried the Furminator this summer. My Maine Coon was having huge problems with fur balls and was not only vomiting them up, but I would find huge brown globs that had obviously passed through the other end a few feet from the litter boxes. I can't imagine passing something like that was either healthy or comfortable. So, I tried the Furminator.
Before the furminator, I had been brushing their fur with a wire brush, wetting it down and then brushing again. That method seemed to work pretty well. I wasn't 100 % sold on the Furminator when I first started to use it. Didn't seem to pull up any more fur than my old method, and in fact I was still wetting their fur down and going over it again with a wire brush because the Furminator left so much loose fur I was afraid they would swallow all of that. But I will say, that the furballs decreased on the Maine Coon - and it does seem to pull out different fur than the wire brush does (i.e. getting deeper into the coat despite its tiny teeth). And, he really likes the Furminator - it must feel good - even better than the wire brush does. He usually comes running to me when he sees me get them out.
I also have two short hair cats. Only one of them lets me really use the Furminator on him. He also really seems to enjoy it. At first, again, I didn't think it did any more than the old wire brush on damp fur. But I do think perhaps it does get a little more. I also follow it up with the wire brush on damp fur just to pull out any loose stuff.
My other short hair cat doesn't have any extra padding and I don't think he likes the Furminator. He isn't a fan of being brushed either but whenever I do his back with the Furminator I feel like I am hitting bone.
So, in summary, two of the three cats really like it and the furballs did reduce. So, will probalby continue to use it. I was amazed at the difference in price between the small dog and the cat versions. I stuck with the cat version as it was quite a bit less.
Jenny September 30th, 2007 11:58:00 AM
I've had good results with the Furminator, too. It is rather pricey for what it is, but it gets a lot of hair off my retrievers. It's clearly old dead hair that's coming off. In the beginning, it was like shearing a sheep--that much hair came off. They seem to like being brushed with it, too.
Arlene September 30th, 2007 12:21:00 PM
The Furminator is just a 40 blade with the cutter removed, mounted on a handle. If you have a dull #40 kicking around the clinic you can slide out the cutter and use it to the same effectiveness. This is what groomers have been doing for years before they "invented" the Furminator.
Zoom Grooms are great on short haired pets but not long haired.
clover September 30th, 2007 12:48:00 PM
I use a undercoat rake on my longcoated akita and from what I can see (after seeing the furminator video) it works the same way. I get TONS of loose hair everytime. I have also used a shedding tool with good results too.
But I am all for anything that gets people grooming more, gimmick or not. :-)
Marie September 30th, 2007 02:01:00 PM
gimmick or no gimmick, i was astonished by the amount of hair that came out of my short-haired cats with the furminator. my mother bought one awhile ago (she has four maine coon cats), so i borrowed it. i could have upholstered an extra cat with the amount of fur i got out of my cats!
katie September 30th, 2007 02:55:00 PM
I learned only after purchasing one that the product is, actually, made in China as of two or three years ago.
However, the product does work as advertised. My previous method of finishing grooming sessions with a flea comb pales in comparison to this tool.
The company is also very prompt in responding to emailed inquiries based on my experience doing so.
Robin M September 30th, 2007 04:29:00 PM
For everyone who says it's the same as the coat rakes and all that. It is not. It is an amazing...tool. I have a corgi, about a 20lbs dog. Now every week or two I brush her out and get a mixing bowl full of fur. I didn't think so much hair could come from such a small dog! It may be expensive, but I don't see the teeth or anything breaking on it anytime soon and I'd say I use it quite a bit. I give it a thumbs up product.
ashleigh September 30th, 2007 11:40:00 PM
Maybe I'm not using it right, but I don't get more hair out with the Furminator alone. I think it loosens a lot of hair, but doesn't actually get it out of my short haired cats' coats.
But if I it in conjunction with one of those Kong Zoom Grooms - then we're talking major difference. The Kong seems to attract the already loosened hair.
Any suggestions on getting better results?
2CatMom October 1st, 2007 01:01:00 PM
On cats you have to pull the skin taught so the teeth can reach down to the skin, where it can grab the undercoat. They caution that overuse in any one area can cause skin irritation, so while you want to grab that undercoat, be careful not to go over the same area too many times.
clover October 1st, 2007 10:35:00 PM
a topic i know a lot about! I'm a groomer and let me tell you something right now... the furminator is EXCELLENT! it does things regular brushes and rakes WILL NOT DO (before your arms fall off). Seriously, i'd seen other 'de-shedding' tools, and none of them work as well. i am speaking as someone who has to get between 6 and 10 dogs in, bathed, dried, brushed/furminated, trimmed/clipped, and out the door... in an average of 3 hours each (we take several dogs in each appointment time slot).
this tool is absolutely necessary for those with high-shedding breeds. akitas, malamutes, huskies, shiba inus, pugs, dalmations, german shepherds, labs, goldens, etc. regular grooming of a full-grown healthy malamute (even as often as once a month) will still not produce the same results. a high-quality diet will not produce the same results (though it will greatly lessen the shedding).
drop-coated breeds like shih tzus and lhasas need not apply, nor will cockers or schnauzers benefit. but for those of you whose dogs leave clumps around the house, this tool is magical!
charity October 2nd, 2007 12:03:00 AM
I have to agree here with Charity and Ashleigh... I was very skeptical, have short-haired dogs and have used inexpensive tools like shedding blades with great results for many years. But last year my boy was having a major puppy coat blow and - although perfectly healthy - he looked worse than motheaten. I broke down and bought a large Furminator (using an old 40 blade will work fine, if you don't need the extra width) - I found I could save about $20 by shopping around, but it's still pricey.
But Oh. My. Gosh. What a difference! It is unlike anything else I've ever used - it is NOT a brush (in fact, the directions specifically say it should NOT be used on a tangled or matted coat). I've never used anything that reaches down and GRABS the hair the same way.
I agree with 2CatMom that sometimes it seems to loosen the hair but doesn't get all the hair OFF the animal's body - sometimes I finish up with a soft brush or even my hand to sweep away the loose hair. But it's money well spent, IMO.
Barb October 2nd, 2007 12:16:00 AM
I bought one at WVC this past February and love it. It does a better job on my Anatolian and German shepherds than any other brush I've tried, and I've tried a lot of them.
Leigh-Ann October 3rd, 2007 03:54:00 PM
Been fighting matts and shedding issues with my Aussie for 4 years now. This is the first tool I've used that she doesn't mind. It removes amazing quantities of undercoat and makes her fur much softer and shinier with only a couple of passes.
Thanks for the recommendation!
Judy October 3rd, 2007 06:03:00 PM
Add Commment