Did you know that Gourmet, that old stalwart of foodie periodical publishing, has just pioneered a new section called “Politics of the Plate”? I’m flabbergasted…and overjoyed.
I’ve been buying this magazine steadily since 1986.Though my subscription has lapsed (for budget-crunching purposes), I still pick up the occasional copy while in line at the supermarket. I even bought two of this June's issue—one to share and one to keep. That’s personally unprecedented—for almost any publication.
The article explains in detail how chickens are typically slaughtered, then delves into other [purportedly more humane] measures now being introduced in Europe. The unflinching treatment of this incendiary subject matter is unprecedented in an American magazine of this caliber and mass-market appeal.
Titled “A View to a Kill,” the article displays not only Daniel Zwerdling’s insightful and indefatigable talent as an investigative reporter (he’s done great stuff for NPR, as well) its cleverly cheeky introductory photograph of Peeps on meat hooks sets just the right tone for what’s to follow, without the visual nastiness that’s sure to come—and does.
Now I’ve seen “chicken processing” done right (according to the faculty at the University of Florida where I spent a semester delving into Animal Science department coursework)—and it’s horrible. Ain’t no other way to see it. I didn’t eat chicken for months as a result of the visuals that wouldn’t disabuse themselves of my psyche. (And re-exposure to this material has done nothing for the Moroccan chicken dish I was planning for my weekend dining pleasure.)
Zwerdling’s research detailed a more modern, larger scale facility than I was exposed to (in 1989). And, though the method varies somewhat, the animal reactions are much the same as he describes: after being carted in (by the overcrowded truckload) and humanly (not “humanely”) handled (four to a hand) in an upside-down power grip, the chickens’ heads are dipped into an electrified bath, essentially rendering them unconscious. They are then hung upside down and necks sliced to bleed them to death. And that’s just the beginning. Because sometimes, it’s admitted, they’re not always fully dead.
Gas chambers used in novel European plants are the solution. Instead of the stressed flapping of hundreds of thousands of wings, chickens arrive in crates which are conveyed into a gas chamber where a vapor replaces oxygen with other breathable elements, effectively suffocating them (but quickly and without all the fright and struggle).
Gourmet’s tack is to warn readers of the info they’re about to consume, but unapologetically launches into Zwerdling’s almost-gory rendition of the bare facts, nonetheless.
I’m gratified to see that even mainstream—nay, old-guard—publications are cognizant of the importance of these issues to the food-driven public. It’s a bellwether of our times and, what’s more, reflects a teeming interest in the reality of how our food gets to us. It’s not just food safety that grabs us, it’s animal cruelty that matters…to a growing percentage of American consumers.
Gourmet got it right. In return, I’ll be spending more of my hard-earned cash on their publication. Aside from sourcing great recipes and interesting food factoids, I’ll be looking forward to more of the same responsible—if unexpected—reporting. Kudos, Gourmet.
Add Comment11 Comments
Here's a link to the article: http://getactive.peta.org/PETA/devarticle.html
Meryl June 23rd, 2007 12:46:00 PM
Meryl: You rock! I couldn't find it--I'm glad you did. Strange bedfellows, no? PETA and Gourmet? Eeenteresting.
Dr. Patty Khuly June 23rd, 2007 09:31:00 PM
I wondered about that myself. But I have to give credit for the link to Kathy, ex-pat blogger and friend to cows everywhere: http://whatdoiknow.typepad.com/.
Meryl June 24th, 2007 12:21:00 AM
Writing a letter to the editor to express how much you appreciated the article, as a pet-lover, a vet, and a consumer, would also be another good thing to do.
zandperl June 24th, 2007 03:31:00 PM
I was always puzzled why gassing isn't more commonly used to kill animals we mean to eat. It works well for large quantities of animals, it's less stress for them, and probably easier on the psyche of the people working in slaughterhouses as well. Without the bleeding out I imagine it's also a little cleaner. Good to see it covered.
Agnes June 25th, 2007 06:09:00 AM
Speaking of the psyche of slaughterhouse workers, I think it speaks volumes that so many of them are illegal aliens. They can't complain about what they see out of a need to protect themselves, and that makes me worry even more about what's going on behind closed doors.
Leigh-Ann June 25th, 2007 06:25:00 AM
Zandperl: I did write a letter to the editor. If any of you would like to do the same you can go to epicurious.com and submit one.
Leigh-Ann: Reminds me of Fast Food Nation, a worthwhile film.
Dr. Patty Khuly June 25th, 2007 09:48:00 AM
I have to admit, I've been somewhat desensitized to the practices surrounding food animals, as I grew up around dairy, cattle, pig and poultry farms. I actually worked in a chicken hatchery for a very short time just after high school (which, I will admit, turned me off chicken for a few years), and on a dairy farm for about ten years while growing up in rural Ontario.
Admittedly, these farms aren't indicative of factory farming or feedlot farming operations, especially those seen in Western Ontario or the US. However, one doesn't shun three decades of experience with "livestock" overnight, even if one is involved heavily in companion animal welfare and rescue. However, my past experiences (both positive and negative) in the farming field allow me to continue to eat meat, while insisting that I do it in a way that I feel is morally responsible.
What I would like to add to this post is simply that generally speaking, those organizations who fight against meat animals are groups like PETA (whose guerrilla tactics I do not approve of... although that topic is for another day) who also promote vegetarianism or veganism.
We meat eaters need to accept that animal farming involves blood, death and practices most find distasteful. A lot of these practices exist out of necessity, for the safety of both the animals and the workers. Now, before I get blasted, let me say that I do agree that gassing an animal is much more humane than dipping it in an "electrified bath" and certainly if more humane technology exists, it should be put into practice. However, this business of meat farming is never going receive the approval of (some of) these groups. The tactic, it would appear, is not to shame them into compliance, but rather out of business.
The approach used by (some of) these groups is usually sensational, and sometimes exaggerated. This allows the target corporation to brush off accusations and demands by simply discrediting the groups involved.
The article mentioned here is actually very well-written, and certainly a step in the right direction. I just think it's imperative to point out the difference between this piece of journalism and the majority of past articles written on the topic. Facts, suggestions for improvement, and straightforward information provided to a knowledgeable public who will (hopefully) then use that information to make informed choices when selecting their meat products. Smaller farms with a commitment to ethical and humane treatment of their animals from birth to slaughter, which use minimal chemicals, antibiotics and other disturbing additives, are the choice of the enlightened consumer.
A letter to the editor is a great idea, especially if the writer points out the exceptional clarity and research that went in to writing the article in question.
A better idea? Speaking with your wallet. Simply put, if you don't approve of these barbaric practices, don't support them. In this day and age, the almighty dollar never loses.
Kim June 25th, 2007 10:05:00 PM
I've slaughtered my own chickens before. It's not fun. It makes me sad,.. but they are completely out of it, if not completely dead, when I do so. I shoot them in the head first after they are very gently hung upside down (it's so gentle there is no struggle or flapping about). I make sure they are truly out of it before I proceed to cut the neck and/or cut the head off. I rarely get veins in my chicken (the reason why they are bled out) and I get great results.
I saw a cow, which was already hung on hooks and supposedly stunned, start to struggle when they began to cut it's throat. I'll never forget the screams.
I do my best to buy from local farmers and I openly ask about slaughter practices. Nothing is perfect, but there are much better ways to raise/slaughter animals than are currently practiced in mass ag in the US.
Jenn June 26th, 2007 01:48:00 AM
Interesting to note Ann Seranne, breeder of multiple BIS winning Yorkies (Mayfair Barban prefix) was the editor of Gourmet magazine years ago. In addition to many cookbooks Seranne wrote the outstanding book "The Joy of Breeding Your Own Show Dog", with a forward by Julia Glasow (Salilyn). Published in 1980 the book has not lost it's relavance and I still refer to mine even after many litters.
Lori Pierson June 28th, 2007 01:50:00 PM
Lori: That's great tirvia! I'm such a foodie and it often seems so different from my life as a vet that it's gratifying to learn of others' similar dual interests. Thanks!
Dr. Patty Khuly June 28th, 2007 06:46:00 PM
Add Commment