She’s not just the quintessentially cute media darling of quick home-cooked fare. She’s a pit bull’s mama, too. And pit bulls couldn’t have a more family-friendly frontman than Rachael Ray—or her sweet-faced pitty Isaboo, for that matter. Someone’s got to steer the world away from the gangsta stereotype pit bulls suffer under. Might as well be the current queen of the American meal.
Martha Stewart may have her splendidly-bred Frenchies, but nothing says I’m down-to-earth like a photogenic pit bull.
Now Rachael Ray’s parlaying that perfect match into a new line of foods. After months of including recipes for meals you can share with your dog on her website, Ms. Ray has finally taken the plunge into that big bag of machine-extruded kibble we call “pet food.”
I really don’t know the particulars except to note that (all?) proceeds from sales of her line of “Nutrish for Pets” will go to Rachael’s Rescue, which funnels funds to organizations like the North Shore Animal League and BadRap, a Bay Area pit bull advocacy group.
From her site:
Look, we all want the best for our furry family members. And that’s exactly why I worked with experts in pet nutrition to create Rachael Ray Nutrish. My Isaboo loves food and treats made with simple, natural ingredients. So, what are you waiting for? Take a look
around. See just how good these foods are and learn a little more about my pet charity, Rachael’s Rescue.
It says, “no junk or fillers” on the site. And though I’m sure one dog’s “fillers” is another’s “pig snouts,” I think I get what she’s going for.
Here’s hoping we’ll see calorie counts on the side of the bag, lots more Isaboo photo ops…and no slacking in the pet recipes on the site now that Rachael’s gone kibble.
Add Comment29 Comments
Here's a link to Nutrish section of Rachael Ray's website:
http://www.rachaelray.com/pets/nutrish.php
Dr. Patty Khuly August 1st, 2008 08:14:00 AM
No-one seems to know what 'fillers' really means, if anything. Even weirdly sourced, cheap ingredients are generally their for nutirition reasons of some sort.
emily August 1st, 2008 09:08:00 AM
Saw the ingredient list, doesn't seem too bad. I might have at least tried this except that the biggest bag it seems to come in is 14lbs. Which seems it would make it more expensive, and necessitate many more trips to the store to buy it.
I almost resent this new addition to the choices. I read so much, agonized so much, looked at the budget a million times and came up with a plan that included (among other things) a kibble choice on the lower priced end of the "quality" stuff. Now I'm back to looking at ingredients and what they mean and agonizing all over again. :O) What to feed is SUCH a hot button.
Lori August 1st, 2008 09:47:00 AM
Regardless of how I feel about the food itself, I am VERY happy to hear that proceeds benefit North Shore and Bad Rap, and I am also so glad that Rachel understands the plight of the Pit Bull and the social responsibility one undertakes when speaking for them (and the thick skin one has to acquire when dealing with anti-Pit morons). I think it's great and Isaboo is adorable. Right now it's just a small step but I think it's a step in the right direction... Pits need all the good publicity they can find. I hope she keeps it up!
Carissa August 1st, 2008 10:16:00 AM
Interesting - I had heard about Rachael's foray into pet food. I didn't realize she was owned by a pit bull though! (I don't watch much TV!) It's nice to hear that she is donating proceeds to charity, including Pit specific ones! Cool!
Tammy August 1st, 2008 11:09:00 AM
The ingredients look like crap.
From the Beef and Brown Rice:
Beef, Chicken Meal, Brewers Rice, Corn Meal, Soybean Meal, Animal Fat
What kind of animal is providing the fat? Don't know? That translates to "junk".
Rob Kolosky August 1st, 2008 12:37:00 PM
In general the ingredient listed first is the highest concentration in the food. Thus most of the food would be beef and chicken meal. Odd you would look at the one thing that is not detailed but is also the lowest concentration in the food to call junk. More then likely they use a mix of animal fat that is not used as a primariy ingrediant as a binder.
Regenia August 1st, 2008 01:13:00 PM
After seeing a news article on this a couple of days ago, I posted it for other local rescue folks to look at. I'm happy to see that she is raising the profile of animal rescue although I certainly wouldn't call her product "premium" food when 2 of the top 6 ingredients are corn and cornmeal. Speaking of filler...
Aubrey August 1st, 2008 01:36:00 PM
A great many animals can live very well on a day of predominantly corn and soy (or a similar seed/bean combo), including people. For obligate carnivores meat plus seed/bean seems not unreasonable to me.
emily August 1st, 2008 01:42:00 PM
When it comes to food ingredients, lists can be very deceptive. The ingredients are listed in order of weight, not concentration in the food, so the heaviest things are first. So, for instance, beef is heavier that other ingredients, but once it is cooked and extruded, so that the water from the beef is mostly gone, it is no longer the heaviest ingredient. So the cereal grains actually end up being the highest concentration in the food.
If you want to know what certain names of ingredients are or mean, look up the AAFCO website, which stands for Association of American Feed Control Officials. They are the ones who set the regulations for pet food, and have standards about what manufacturers can put on and in the bag. It is rather boring reading (I have their manual) but very enlightening! AAFCO has its problems and drawbacks, but it is all we've got for now!
sassy August 1st, 2008 02:02:00 PM
I never heard of Rachel Ray, until my Mom had her cooking shows on TV as a faithful fan. I applaud her charitable interests and promotion of Isaboo, but sure wish she investigated canine "nutrish" a little more thoroughly. Corn, soy, chicken meal, corn gluten, and animal fat aren't high on my list of preferred ingredients either.
Barbara A. Albright/New Hampshire August 1st, 2008 02:08:00 PM
Sorry, folks, but this may as well be a bag of Dog Chow or Beneful. Brewers Rice? Corn Meal? ANIMAL Fat? Menadione?
Sorry Rachel, but you just logged in one step below Ellen in my book... and that's not easy.
Kim August 1st, 2008 02:37:00 PM
Emily - not sure about the dog food world, but when it comes to aquatic animals, we always used cellulose for filler. Of course, those were experimental diets.
Regina - Yeah, while it may be on back on the list of ingredients, "animal fat" also appears to be the primary source of lipids for this diet- which is somewhat distressing. Fats are important for a myriad of things: energy, essential fatty acids, nutrient absorption (fat soluble vitamins), hormonal, and structural (like cell membranes). Fat is also a key attractant and important for palatability of any feed. It's very important to have a quality lipid source, as a crappy one can easily lead to nutritional deficiencies. Personally, I look for some sort of fish meal (which is most likely going to be menhaden) and/or fish oil along with another Omega-3 source like canola oil. "animal fat" would not be high on my list as a quality source, as it's most likely rendered from animal waste from the slaughter house.
Chip August 1st, 2008 03:31:00 PM
Usually all ingredients prior to and including the fat are main components in the food. Beef and chicken meal sound good but the other four are not things I'd feed to my animal. I do like that she's helping with the pit bull stereotype and donating the proceeds of her food to charities but would have been nice for her to create a higher quality food.
Shannon Watts August 1st, 2008 05:34:00 PM
And some highlights from the Isaboo Bacony Burger Flavor Grill Bites: High Fructose Corn Syrup, Propylene Glycol, Animal Fat (Preserved with BHA), Artificial Color, Menadione... YUM! Thanks, Rachael, for these simple, natural ingredients!
LaShelle August 1st, 2008 10:59:00 PM
I could write a book here, but I will refrain! There are some good things about this food, but others that raise red flags. I agree with those who have mentioned animal fat - I prefer to know the source of the fat. I would be happier to see poultry fat instead. Animal fat though, is not my biggest concern. On the website, it says that this food can be fed 'for all life stages'. Do you really know what this means? It means that it contains enough nutrition for the times in a dog's life that it need the most nutrition - pregnancy, nursing, and puppyhood. Thus, it contains more nutrition than an adult or senior dog needs. Some would say that more is better - but the extra has to be dealt with somehow. And that means that the liver and kidneys have to excrete the extra nutrients, particularly the extra protein. The extra load is not good for them, and over time can exacerbate and accelerate kidney and liver failure.
Secondly, I want to see the statement of nutritional adequacy that is required to be on the bag. I don't like the fact that this nutritional adequacy statement is found nowhere in this website that I can find. There are two ways of determining nutritional adequacy - animal feeding trials, and formulation. Trials mean that it has been fed to dogs for a certain amount of time, and they were adequately nourished during the trial (for rules for animal feeding trials, see the AAFCO website). Formulation means that the food was formulated to meet the nutrition requirements - with no proof that it actually does. This means that if you feed your dog this food, you are testing this food on YOUR dog. I would never feed a food that did not state that animal feeding trials had been done.
sassy August 2nd, 2008 12:37:00 PM
It's garbage food plain and simple.
xtrgr8chance August 3rd, 2008 12:10:00 AM
I'm glad she's donating the proceeds to Bad Rap and whatever, but the food is still crap. (Thank you, Rob.) Corn is the biggest allergen known to dog. Sell out.
Margot August 3rd, 2008 02:57:00 PM
Corn is NOT highly allergenic, despite the rumors that spread on the internet. The most common allergen to dog is beef, believe it or not. I wish I had my Clinical Nutrition for Small Animals book at home so I could quote it exactly.
Kim, you are right. I was being simplistic is saying that protein can cause kidney damage. What causes kidney damage is the nitrogen waste products from protein metabolism, as well as high levels of phosphorus, which can be linked to proteins. Highly digestible proteins are indeed great for dogs, especially older dogs, to help preserve lean muscle mass. It is more complicated than saying "Feed meat, dogs are carnivores". But an 'all life stages' food is not good for an older dog because of the trace nutrients such as minerals that can cause a lot of damage, and are not needed by the older dog. It's kind of like clothes that say 'one size fits all' - NOT true!
sassy August 5th, 2008 06:15:00 PM
I hate to be snarky, but you're actually BOTH wrong (Margot and sassy). Corn and beef are no more "allergenic" than pheasant or sweet potato, it is just that more dogs are EXPOSED to them therefore leading more to become allergic to it, since corn and beef are in a lot of foods on the market. There is this theory out there that beef and corn should be avoided in all dogs at all costs always and it's a lot of hype.
I agree with the majority of posters that this food is crap. I work at an independent pet store that specializes in holistic and organic dog foods, including raw, and have done a lot of research into nutrition. This will definitely not be on our shelves!
Cat August 6th, 2008 09:55:00 PM
Seems to me that RR has outsourced the product and merely put her name on it. Sad. But I love what she does for pitbulls! I think her heart is in the right place. But I doubt she feeds this food to her own pups. I would't feed it to mine.
agadoresmama August 7th, 2008 11:08:00 PM
Actually Cat, Beef is the number one meat protein allergy cause in dogs and cats. I don't attribute it to the beef, I attribute it to the hormones, etc., that are in the beef.
The theory that it leads the pack because more dogs are exposed to it is ridiculous. Pick up nine out of ten bags these days and you're going to see chicken as the main ingredient. Chicken is FAR cheaper to produce than beef.
As far as corn being an allergy, again, I don't believe, personally that it's the corn. I don't think they should eat corn, but I think it's got more to do with aflatoxins and storage mites than the corn itself.
But the Beef thing is reality. Ask any veterinary allergist and they will tell you that dogs test positive for beef allergies faster and stronger than any other meat protein.
If access were what precipitated allergies as far as meat proteins go, there would be FAR more chicken protein allergies (and they're actually quite rare when the chicken is of good quality) along with herring, salmon, turkey, duck and lamb. Our store, for example, carries more raw foods that contain beef than commercial foods. As a matter of fact, Merrick Cowboy Cookout is the one and only beef-based kibble we carry that has beef in it, and not one kitty food with beef. We do have some canned beef, but that's processed differently, and doesn't react the same.
But I am in total agreement. This crap will definitely NEVER hit our shelves!
Kim August 17th, 2008 05:08:00 PM
Any food that has corn and "animal fat" (what animal?) is one that I would never consider. Sorry Rachel Ray, but you've got to do better than that.
Deb August 30th, 2008 12:13:00 PM
There is a lot of confusion about a species appropriate diet for dogs. The "why" is that we have crossed the line between science and prolific industry propaganda. Since the 1950s vast sums of money have been poured into shaping public perception because the profits are enormous. Not to mention that “we the people” have a tendency towards anthropomorphism, and convenience is a driving force.
For unbiased scientific information see the "Ol' Shep's Plight: Diet" article at: http://achinook.squarespace.com/
There is also a "lighter" fabricated "Dr. P. Kibble Interview" and other articles following different threads of industry's manipulation.
My best to you and yours,
Lee Cullens
Lee Cullens September 15th, 2008 10:55:00 PM
VHS to DVD Converter VHS Converter
natti June 10th, 2009 05:05:22 AM
Well, recently I've seen a film about the breeds of dogs. Found it at the torrents files search engine <a href=http://www.picktorrent.com> http://www.picktorrent.com </a> . I know that it pit bulls are considered to be the most dangerous dogs, but in this film it was not mentioned at all. It was only said that they are very devouted and if they love the owner they will love for ever. Maybe it's just one of people's stereotypes.By the way, I also think the food is nice.
Kevin August 20th, 2009 11:40:11 AM
Well, recently I've seen a film about the breeds of dogs. Found it at the torrents files search engine http://www.picktorrent.com . I know that it pit bulls are considered to be the most dangerous dogs, but in this film it was not mentioned at all. It was only said that they are very devouted and if they love the owner they will love for ever. Maybe it's just one of people's stereotypes.By the way, I also think the food is nice.
Kevin August 20th, 2009 11:44:19 AM
Thanks for your sharing.Maybe you are interested in Abercrombie and Fitch.
AF September 20th, 2009 01:52:08 AM
The fighter pilots and bomber crews for World War I and World War II wore UGG Boots in their airplanes for warmth. Back then,ugg boots airplanes did not yet have pressurized cabins to keep in air and warmth, and at high altitudes,UGGS the air got cold-very cold. During these times, UGGS were considered not just masculine items,ugg boots but soldier's gear. tiffany jewellery Tiffany Sets Tiffany Rings Tiffany Bracelets tiffany jewelry Tiffany Bracelets Tiffany Sets Tiffany Rings tiffany jewelry Bracelets Tiffany Sets Rings ugg australia
Ed Hard September 21st, 2009 02:54:37 AM
Add Commment