Yes, it’s true. We modern humans are a confused lot. Though most of us adore our pets and reward them with familiar integration, some of us get a little freaky about how we do this. Along with the so called “pets-as-children” phenomenon comes its unwelcome extreme: infantilization.
In case you’re not sure what I mean by this, the above photo should say it all. If you’re still fuzzy, here’s the scoop: infantilization is defined by Merriam-Webster’s as “to make or keep infantile (infant-like).”
People do this to their pets. And we veterinarians wish they wouldn’t. Here are some examples (I’m sure you have more):
1-The Yorkie who lives in diapers so she never need be trained (her owner also gets a kick out of bottle-feeding her milk).
2-The cat who lives fully dressed (complete with obligatory hat) and is trained to always use the bathroom when her owner does—on toilet paper.
3-The teacup Pom who can go nowhere unless fully clothed so that no one can stare at her exposed “coochie.” (Who can see a thing anyway with all that fluff?)
This is but a trio of the examples I’m treated to on a regular basis. Sure, you say, some people are just weird—that’s life. But this extreme behavior bodes ill for the animals in myriad ways.
Urine scalding? Inappropriate elimination problems? Dominance aggression? Poor nutrition? Munchausen’s-by-proxy (in one notable case)? All are pitfalls of keeping pets in a condition they don’t belong.
And it’s getting more common if my experience is any guide. With the increasing acceptance of pets as family members, these extreme oddities (and others well on their way to following their example) are more prevalent than ever.
In Miami, clothing shops for pets also offer baby carriages, baby bottles, cribs and other infantile accoutrements made just for dogs. You’ve seen the pacifier toys, right? They’re not just for pups anymore. And teacup pup shops? They’re built for this trade (though I’ll hasten to add that most teacup keepers are not this freaky—many are darn normal and thank God for that).
You might think vets would relish this novelty. It can only mean people are willing to spend more on their pets—which includes their healthcare.
But I don’t. Behavior consultation, nutritional consultation, hygiene issues. I have enough on my plate without having to explain why a tight, Shakira-style dress worn 24/7 is not a good thing (see where her fur’s getting rubbed off?).
People can be eccentric and I welcome their quirks. (After all, I keep goats in suburbia. I revel in eccentricity.) But there’s a line I draw when it comes to abusing the health of the animals in their care.
When I lay it out for them I fully expect them to go find other vets. But somehow they keep coming back, in spite of the fact that I’ll have nothing to do with the diaper thing. Maybe other vets are smarter and refuse to indulge them altogether.
And that makes sense. There’s not one vet I know who looks forward to a Pug in a baby carriage, much though the waiting room’s occupants may coo.
Add Comment25 Comments
I agree. NOT COOL. Dogs are ANIMALS, for Pete's sake, and should be treated as such, even though they are also members of the family. I frequently refer to my two pooches as "the kids," but they only eat their own food, get walked on leashes, go potty in the backyard and get left at home while I'm at work. I wouldn't treat a human like that, and I wouldn't treat an animal like a human. Even though I do believe I'd run into a burning building to save them, if necessary.
Shasta April 29th, 2008 11:08:00 AM
And you know, there's nothing wrong with a jaunty bandana or a pretty barrette in lieu of a bang trim, but entire ensembles? No dog of mine is dressing better than me, ha ha.
Shasta April 29th, 2008 11:10:00 AM
I've heard Cesar Milan say many times in his show that your pet is first a DOG then a -insert breed here- and then has an individual personality. I note that the list does not include "kiddie". I'm not sure when including pets as family members transitioned to "No really, my pet wears diapers and gets pushed in a stroller". Can we pin this on Paris Hilton?
slt April 29th, 2008 11:23:00 AM
Mox gets a spiffy bandanna after grooming, which lasts about 36 hours before it's somewhere in the yard, and he has a sweater for winter if he's not shaggy enough for the weather. Other than that? No dress up for him.
Our old dog Sandy did have a set of undies - but that was for when she went into heat the first (and last) time.
But then there was my friend's cat Charley. Poor Charley - when we were little, we would dress him up in baby clothes, put him in the doll carriage and take him around the neighborhood. And Charley would put up with it! Who knew we were such freaky trendsetters. (He did spent the majority of his time blissfully nekkid.)
Cindy April 29th, 2008 11:40:00 AM
I have 3 Chinese Crested Hairless dogs that do require sweaters sometimes when it gets cold in Florida. They are dressed only when it is cold. I do not see the need to put clothes on an animal that already has fur. It looks silly & is just a waste of money.
This weekend I worked at a yard sale in support of a pet rescue. A woman came with her 2 children. The children were dressed in old, dirty clothes and did not have on shoes. However, the woman told me all about her little Yorkie that had a closet full of clothes and how she planned to buy the dog a new, spring wardrobe when her disability check came on the first of the month. There was so much I wanted to say to this woman, but I knew it was not going to make an impression.
Susan G. April 29th, 2008 01:05:00 PM
I have 4 dachshunds...and it gets really cold in the winter here in NJ....so I bought them sweaters so when we go out to pee....they don't stand and shake....however...by the time they have their sweaters on, are convinced that yes, it's okay to walk in the sweater, and it will keep you warm...
chances are the pees on the floor.
They HATE the sweaters...even though they DO get cold and shivery for the 5 minutes they are outside.
so you can't convince me a dog actually likes to wear clothes....
however it is funny to see my one dog in her sweater...she's sure she can't stand up in it (it's not tight and doesn't even have back legs...
she'll drag herself on her belly until you take it off.
LorriM April 29th, 2008 02:11:00 PM
I agree, it's really ridicu… What's that pookie? Someone want a rubby dubby belly rub? You want a treat? Some ice cream? You feel better now…you want to take a nap in my bed? I lift you up there and put the your blankie on.
…oops, sorry about that. As I was saying it's totally ridiculous. They are dogs, not humans. I just don't understan… what's that snuggles? You want some water?…oh, I'll have to post later
Lawrence Linn April 29th, 2008 04:35:00 PM
Same as Susan, I have a Chinese Crested. I actually have a hard time finding 'real' warm coats, etc. because so many doggie outfits seem to be made just for 'show' and not even really for warmth. I know that people think I'm a nut for having a dog in a windbreaker out on a walk, but she actually needs it sometimes. =P
I agree that the 'pets as surrogate babies' thing is getting more and more out of hand, though. And I spoil my dog... but she is an adult animal, not a helpless baby. Treating her like an invalid would be wrong.
Pai April 29th, 2008 05:09:00 PM
I pretty much agree with this sentiment, although I would say that farther North, there are sometimes very cold, windy days when wind chills dip below freezing, and small dogs with hair but little body fat (yorkie, maltese) do indeed seem to benefit from a plain old dog sweater. That's not going too far, right?
Stefani April 29th, 2008 05:15:00 PM
I swore I would never be one of THOSE owners who dressed up their dogs when I got one. And then I ended up with the world's most temperature-sensitive beagle. She refuses to go outside in these Northern falls/winters/springs without some sort of garment protecting her delicate self from the elements. She doesn't like getting INTO them, but once the coat/sweater/raingear/boots/whatever the elements call for is on, she will play outside for hours, rather than lie on her back, shivering, with all four paws in the air, in the bitter, 50 degree-and-sunny weather
She has a tiny wardrobe now. Sigh.
vxm April 29th, 2008 05:36:00 PM
In Florida, to be brutally frank, you don't know what cold is. (And there are parts of the US--and you don't even have to go to Alaska to find them--where they'd say that we here in Massachusetts don't know what cold is.)
Addy is a Chinese Crested Powderpuff. She has hair. She also has very litle body fat. This is _not_ a dog designed for the outdoors in a northern winter. This is a dog designed to be a household companion.
She appreciates a tshirt or light jacket on the colder spring and fall days. In real winter, she has a parka. She _hates_ getting her feet wet--so even though she doesn't like putting her boots on, she's _much_ easier to walk in rain or snow once they're on.
And, oh yes, she has a raincoat.
She's also housetrained; she potties outside, no diapers. She has some clothes that are just For Cute, but most of the time, if the weather allows, she wears nothing but her collar and leash when we go out. Her basic obedience is good. She walks on her own four feet--hence the boots in wet weather. She eats her own food, not mine. (Sometimes she steals the cats' food.) She's a dog; I haven't mistaken her for an infant.
But I also haven't mistaken her for my sister's Lab, or the neighbor's GSD.
Lis April 29th, 2008 06:25:00 PM
Something I never saw coming.
As I revise the class rules for group obedience and puppy classes, I'm adding a clause: No Clothes On Dogs.
No dresses. No sailor suits. No patent-leather dog pumps. No hats. Just ... NO.
If someone has a hairless breed in winter, or a dog with a surgical site, sutured wound, or skin condition that needs to be covered with some utilitarian protection, we'll talk. Otherwise, nekkid dogs.
Two reasons.
The other dogs view "clothed" dogs as squeak toys, and will try to jump them. Seen it.
The instructor does not employ an assistant to hold her hair while she pukes.
Of course this is not just infantalization of dogs. Infantalizing dogs is when we seek to keep them perpetual *puppies.* (Something that owners do a lot.) This owner derangement seeks to turn adult dogs into human infants. Anthroinfantilization?
H Houlahan April 29th, 2008 07:59:00 PM
"Two reasons.
The other dogs view "clothed" dogs as squeak toys, and will try to jump them. Seen it.
The instructor does not employ an assistant to hold her hair while she pukes."
I trust that you realize that the first is an actual reason, or would be if it described the real world, but the second is just an indication that the instructor needs to get over herself.
Some of the specific items of clothing you mentioned would in fact get in the way in obedience class, regardless of the reaction of other dogs. In Addy's obedience classes, though, I never found a difference in how other dogs reacted to her depending on whether she had a tshirt on or not. (The boots and parka or raincoat, in bad weather, came off for practical reasons, not due a decision on her trainer's part to inappropriately impose her own aesthetic preferences.)
And, um, pardon me for mentioning this, but should your hair, if it's that long, be uncontained when you're working with a group of not-yet-trained dogs?
Lis April 29th, 2008 08:54:00 PM
I used to think that the strollers for cats and dogs were rather silly, until I came across a neighbor pushing a stroller with three small dogs. The oldest one was not able to walk very far but adored his walks. He would walk until he started to tire then ride the rest of way. This way, he didn't need to walked seperately or left at home while the other two had their walk.
Meg April 29th, 2008 09:43:00 PM
I agree with many of the above comments that there are times when putting clothing on pets, especially ones with thin fur and/or little body fat is appropriate, productive and protective of their health, especially in cold climates. I think there is a difference between this recognition that the dog needs some sort of clothing for its benefit and the people who put clothing on their pets for their own human benefit or because it satisfies their need for a child-substitute.
People who put diapers on dogs rather than training them and thus put their pet at risk for urine scalding and infections, have their pets wear clothing to the extent that it damages their skin and fur, and see their pets as tiny furry babies rather than dogs/cats/parrots/etc are setting themselves and their animals up for problems both medically and behaviorally.
I have two GSDs. They wear bandanas. (Apparently if you are a GSD wearing a bandana in my area, you are 10x LESS scary than if you are NOT wearing said bandana. Strange but true.) They are taken better care of than most humans I know. I love them and would probably run into a burning building to save them. I have considered winter booties (ice and salted sidewalks = bad), but there is a difference between loving my dogs excessively and forgetting they are dogs. I need to do what is in a dog's best interest to keep them healthy, NOT what is in a human infant's best interest, which is something that some of these 'special' clients seem to forget. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seemed to me that this is what Dr. Khuly was getting at.
lindabcs April 29th, 2008 10:50:00 PM
I always feel so sorry for little guys treated this way...they're usually terribly un-socialized, fearful of new situations, no confidence whatsoever, etc., etc. They don't know what to do if they aren't in their owner's arms - and it's really irritating to try and work with a pet who panics if all four paws are on the ground at once. I just wish some people would treat their small breeds (the ones who usually get dressed up) like regular dogs - rolling in the grass, running through a field, etc., etc...so many dog experiences that they miss out on b/c they're being toted around in purses and tutus.
anna April 29th, 2008 11:09:00 PM
OK, I agree infantilization of an animal is wrong. There are some exceptions to the rules.
Many commenters in the Northern climes know that sometimes a sweater / parka is necessary protection for your dog's health - and sometimes paw pads make sense too. (If anyone can tell me how to keep my peke from marching out of them, I will be very grateful! He starts the 3-paw dance when the ice starts but pretends he isn't endangering his paws!)
I can only think of one good reason for diapers (not pads for female dogs) - incontinence in an older dog. And, if you are doing this, you better be checking and changing it often! To not housetrain your dog is to set up a terrible dominance issue that will leak into other areas.
Now, granted, there are days I wonder if my dog is really a dog and not the reincarnation of Napoleon - but that is just a pekingese thing. 2000 years of being royalty has to have bred some of that attitude into them.
MLO April 29th, 2008 11:42:00 PM
I have cute little toy foxy type. She wears a practical pull on fleecy clothes (I made them for her) when the weather warrants it – and she really seems to appreciate it unlike many who would rather freeze au naturale thank you very much. But I’ve never thought of her as anything but a dog and never treated her as anything but a dog – and a tough little vermin huntin’ dog at that!
She is a very straightforward and cheerful little soul. I’ve had several vets say of her “What a nice little dog” with the emphasis on the “little” and I know what they mean – I have seen so many of these “darling little dogs” that have been systematically, if unconsciously, “trained” to be anxious and even snappy by silly owners who project their own hang-ups onto the poor animal, you know, cooing and caressing the cringing, snarling little horror. I’ve had some of these people say to me that “These little ones are so highly strung aren’t they?” as they cradle their poor baby in their arms, to which I have to reply, “Well, no, mine isn’t.”
I could never imagine treating my dogs (or other animals) as if they were my children although I might very well be been guilty of treating my children as if they were dogs sometimes – clicker training is just brilliant for teaching a child to iron properly, BTW, even if the dried liver treats are NOT appreciated for some reason!
Alison April 30th, 2008 02:05:00 AM
in the grooming salon, there is nothing worse than the sweater-wearing (long-haired)dog. Just today I had a 6month old Lhasa puppy who was matted to the skin under his leopard-print sweater. I wanted to shake the owner. Most people wouldn't wear a sweater without taking it off for weeks on end, so why would you do this to your dog?
later on, i noticed the puppy hacking and coughing for no apparent reason. I had already noted a severe overbite (literally, about 1in) and wondered if maybe the two were connected. no, as it turns out, the owner was already aware of the cough. apparently the puppy has kennel cough, but she's "not about to spend $229 to treat a little cough".
gee, thanks a lot lady, now I have to douse and scrub everything your dog came in contact with in surgical sanitizer (instead of just spraying with Lemon Quat disinfectant). I hope she's proud of herself, having saved $229, when she's probably going to cause a small outbreak of kennel cough wherever she takes her dog.
but yeah, clothes are cute, my Silky wears t-shirts sometimes. Just don't go overboard, AND PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE BRUSH OUT YOUR LONG-HAIRED DOGS AT LEAST ONCE A DAY IF YOU DRESS UP YOUR DOG!
charity April 30th, 2008 02:41:00 AM
Well, I think people put clothes on their animals for lots of different reasons. I know MANY big dog owners (GSD, Rotties, Pitties, etc.) that do it to "soften" the appearance of their breed, I know many people that do it for weather reasons (cold, rainy), and I know MANY people that do it for fun. I don't personally understand the last one, but that's just me. It's strange, but at the same time I see the dogs prancing around loving the attention. And then I think, is it so bad that this owner loves this animal to death? Nope. Not my cup of tea, but to each their own. The people I know that put clothes on their dog for fun would not hesitate to make sure the dog has the best of everything, including health care and choice of food.
I think it's a slippery slope however when the clothes and accoutrements come at a cost to healthcare, premium food or general well being. That is screwed up, and unfortunately a small minority of dog owners turns the tide that all small dog owners are nut jobs. I also am not fully on board with the dog stroller. I patiently listen to the reasons people have them, but I don't buy into it. I just leave it at that (unless the dog has a broken leg or something....I guess?). I think in today's fast-paced life, the human need to constantly categorize and stereotype people to "save time" comes at a cost of taking each situation at face value. It's leading to the downfall of communities and the way we communicate around the world, IMHO.
As for the perpetual diapers, dressing of the cat (I'm fairly certain that is a form of torture for cats, the indignity!) and such- it is tragic and I think it speaks to underlying psychologial issues for these people. Is it possible to slip the name/number of a good therapist into his/her bag? Lol......
Creature of Habit April 30th, 2008 08:44:00 AM
Yeah, one of my dogs is a wimp for the cold. Even in Miami she'll refuse to go out without her sweater if the temp is lower than 60. I don't mind making her comfortable--in fact, I love to feel she needs me and appreciates the things I do. But I don't treat her or think of her as my baby, much though I mau spoil her.
Ah, the bandana effect. This, too, is OK. Simple. Often practical. It's like a nice collar. Why not make them more attractive to you and others? But everything's got a limit, right?
Dr. Patty Khuly April 30th, 2008 08:58:00 AM
Ah, Anthroinfantalization? Nice word!
After reading your post, Dr., I feel so darned reasonable about letting my dogs on the sofa.
Yeah, no clothes for them. Their hair is longer than mine.
Lisa April 30th, 2008 09:36:00 AM
My friend's pittie mix has an extensive collection of tiaras and feather boas. But he's kind of a special case- and he doesn't get the "EEEK SCARY DOG" reactions anymore, which was all she wanted. (And in fairness, she just bought him the Princess tiara, friends have been accessorizing him since, and he just eats up the attention. :P)
I will admit to having bought Lizzie a sweatshirt (In portland when she was acting cold and was in that 4 month old hairless phase- we had a warm winter here in Dallas and it was 30 degrees colder with high humidity and tons of wind, so she really wan't equipped to deal with it) and a t-shirt dress (Becuase it was $3 and it covers up the velcro on her bitch panties that she otherwise pulls off. She's never worn it other than that, and she hasn't worn the sweatshirt except in Portland. A little bit of silly fun is harmless, but some people are CREEPY.
Cait April 30th, 2008 11:44:00 AM
My personal favorite was taking my Sheltie to PetCo for the first time and a dog in a HUMAN baby stroller -- not the kind adapted for pets! -- decides my boy is public enemy numero uno and explodes in a barking fit. Kinda hard to tell your dog not to be scared when it scares the crap out of you first! It's a miracle he's willing to go anywhere near a stoller now.
Catsie April 30th, 2008 12:58:00 PM
The only clothes item I've ever had my black and tan Shiba wear is a bright orange reflecting vest/cover. This is for walking at night so that she is more visible to cars. She is not real fond of it.
glock May 1st, 2008 01:25:00 PM
Add Commment