I have a great gift idea for someone who wants to make their favorite veterinarian very happy. Find them a ginormous, computerized, veterinary drug interaction program. Best yet, make it one that can fit both in the palm of her hand (ideally on her iPhone) and tie into her office’s computerized invoicing function.
Anything to keep her from making mistakes. Please. Something to make it easy for her to question the use of two or more drugs in combination. A method that means she can have this info readily available instead of how it works now: time-consuming emails to veterinary pharmacists, phone calls to drug companies, visits to the specialty hospital for detailed discussions that almost always end in I-don’t-knows, etc.

It’s not easy, you know, making sure your once and future polypharmacy patients get the help they need when it comes to taking more than one medication at a time. God knows we have plenty of patients who do take multiple meds for one or more specific conditions.
As you might expect, this population of pets is more than keeping pace with our ability to keep them alive longer. Problem is, they can’t yet reach what we believe might be their potential for even greater comfort and longevity without the significant risk of adverse drug interactions.
The truth is that we don’t yet understand how all the drugs we now use in dogs and cats work when used in combination with one another. It’s this uncomfortable reality that’s emerging as a very real barrier to greater success in long-term pet care.
Sure, there’s plenty of information out there. Veterinarians and pet owners who work hard to find it can access the basics. But it shouldn’t be so hard! As I intimated in my opening paragraph, veterinary drug interaction information is currently not well organized.
Think Medscape. This Internet behemoth for human healthcare education offers a simple plug-in-your-drugs function to determine whether your meds might be giving you trouble. No such sophisticated functionality exists, anywhere, for pets. For the top-twenty pet meds, yes. For the vast majority of what’s now available? Only in my dreams. And that’s a problem.
Consider yesterday’s patient. Seven ear old shepherd mix. He’s an allergic skin disease sufferer who’s been successfully treated with Atopica (cyclosporine)...as long as he takes a big, expensive daily dose. After a stint at the ophthalmologist’s place for corneal surgery last week, his eyes are doing great.
The problem? The eye doc put him on a low dose of Rimadyl (carprofen) for a week to control his post-operative pain. Now he’s feeling sluggish. Does his belly hurt from the Rimadyl? Is the cyclosporine taking its toll on his kidneys now? Did the specialist even realize this dog was on a high-ish dose of Atopica before starting the Rimadyl?
So I call the eye doc (gone for the day). I call Pfizer (the drugs’ manufacturers). It’s late. I hold and get no one. I fire off an email to my favorite Veterinary Information Network clinical pharmacologist. And wait. My favorite local internal medicine specialist suspects a problematic interaction and confirms my recommendation to stop both meds for the moment.
This process is typical. 20 minute of digging online and another 20 minutes of phone calls and I have nothing to show for it aside from the same sneaking, but unconfirmed, suspicion I had when I started. And these are among the garden-variety of drugs we prescribe. Nothing too fancy, really.
Sure, I can hazard guesses...and I do (often). Because I have to. There’s no hard and fast data revealing the commoner complications we see with the drug reactions. No chart helping us decide how much to taper one dose to reduce the risk of X effects when administered with another.
So here’s where I ask....
...if anyone knows of a drug interaction resource more complete than the 12 by 12 chart currently hanging in my lab and the only slightly better veterinary practice management software plug-ins.
If so, please, please tell me. Because until someone in the veterinary clinical pharmacology arena decides to build me the drug interaction application of my dreams I might as well be playing pin the tail on the donkey with some of my drug selections. And none of us wants that.
Add Comment35 Comments
Dr. Patty, you may have your wishes from a clinical standpoint, but as a customer I'd be much happier if the veterinarian simply gave me a photocopied sheet like I get from the (human) pharmacy with the possible side effects, common interactions, and danger signs.
Turns out that one of my pups is allergic to Previcox; if I hadn't known to watch for things like low capillary refresh rate in the gums and known how fast she usually bounces back from anesthesia, I might not have caught the subtle warning signs in time that made me call my vet at midnight and ask her what the "danger signs" list for the drug is.
Karl Katzke May 7th, 2009 10:54:17 AM
Dr Khuly, does the problem lean more toward the information not being organized anywhere accessible, or is it more that most drug interactions just aren't known or documented at all? Creating a system to organize and compile scattered information sounds like a doable project but if it's largely a matter of "no one knows", then it sounds like there's a much larger problem with lack of research and documentation.
Karl - I agree, getting a print out with any vet meds would be lovely. I've had one pet prescription filled at a compounding pharmacy and I got the full consult with a pharmacist where they went over all the details, but usually it's just picking up a bottle of pills at the front desk from the receptionist after they've been dispensed in the back, and all the information you're given is the vet telling you how much, when and how long, with no discussions about contraindications, side effects or danger signs. Vet medicine could definitely do better when it comes to informing patients about prescriptions.
Anlina Sheng - abnormalloveofcats.com May 7th, 2009 11:09:44 AM
Assuming you have Plumb's, that would be a good start (also available for Palms if you have one). Maybe invest in some of the newer additions of drug formularies for your practice, ask members on VIN what their favorites are. Consider collecting your own monographs in a binder and labeling appropriately for easy access in your clinic's "library" space.
lexipup May 7th, 2009 11:22:58 AM
I have access to all the advanced drug resources VIN offers and still have trouble. Often. Barbara's question is spot-on. Some of it is just not well studied. But it seems like every time I find a clinical pharmacologist, I get smart answers. So you would think someone would compile a reasonable list of possibilities. Unfortunately, it may well be more a matter of "we don't know the answers well enough to risk our necks on missing some possible interactions."
Dr. Patty Khuly May 7th, 2009 11:39:36 AM
IMO, Medscape is a beta test and I'm being generous. But at least they had a starting place. If vets and pet people want this, don't follow their lead of starting with the drug company's claim that a drug is relatively safe. You need somewhere that will take reports from vets and owners and compile the data. If you really got that off the ground and running, you'd have that data from a more reliable source and you'd probably end up doing more for humans than you can possibly imagine as well. So glad I insisted on good dentures and refused to use that gunk called "denture cream". FDA, yeah, sure, whatever.
PJBoosinger May 7th, 2009 12:16:23 PM
Karl: Yes, package inserts for every single drug would be great. That's why I tend to use the small, prepackaged pain relievers for one-time-only cases. That's also why I'm gunning for a better computer system (paperless medical records) with easily printable package inserts.
Dr. Patty Khuly May 7th, 2009 12:17:17 PM
We gave our Vet two tickets to a big Art Exhibit at the Museum as a show of appreciation.
Evet May 7th, 2009 12:56:00 PM
Ah, now I see why it took my vet a day (instead of an hour or so) to look up a possible interaction and get back to me. At the time, I just thought she was probably overwhelmed with emergencies, or something; there'd even been one that came in during our checkup. She also told me that she couldn't find a definitive answer, so we decided to just play it safe.
There are so many drug interaction resources for people, it never occurred to me that they might not be so handy and ubiquitious for pets. That's gotta be stressful.
Galadriel May 7th, 2009 12:56:26 PM
If there are tools for human medicines, why not use those? It's likely that the interactions will be similar. Even if you're using a veterinary-only drug, such as Rimadyl, you can check for similar drugs.
I went onto the Medscape site you gave and entered Cyclosporin (oral) and Ibuprofen (oral), since ibuprofen is an NSAID, same as Rimadyl. Here's what it said:
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Cyclosporine increases the production of prostaglandin E2 and I2. Prostaglandin E2 has been shown to prevent cyclosporine -induced renal toxicity in animals. NSAIDS may increase cyclosporine-induced renal toxicity by blocking the formation of prostaglandins.
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent administration of cyclosporine and a NSAID may result in a decrease in renal function, with or without an alteration in cyclosporine levels.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: None determined.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Patients receiving concurrent therapy should be monitored for a decrease in renal function. The NSAID may need to be discontinued.
DISCUSSION: A decrease in renal function has been reported with concurrent cyclosporine and diclofenac, sulindac, mefenamic acid, ketoprofen, piroxicam, and naproxen. Decreasing the cyclosporine dose without discontinuing the NSAID does not appear to improve renal function.
Pretty useful, and it took me less than a minute to find.
Mary Straus May 7th, 2009 01:05:55 PM
Drugs don't act in pets the way they do in people. The particular drug combo my vet was checking, for example, was one *I* had been on with no problems. My vet couldn't find anything like a study that showed interactions between the two, but did find one comment about "significant morbidity"...
Galadriel May 7th, 2009 01:51:50 PM
Any of you vets scanning those package inserts and posting them somewhere? (They probably have a copyright symbol on them but they're intended for distribution...)
PJBoosinger May 7th, 2009 02:08:35 PM
well with animals, you also have the species and breed differences, making it all that more complicated.
A shepherd mix? That would ring bells for me about some kind of atypical genetics kind of reaction to the drug combination - but again, that's just a sneaking, unconfirmed suspicion.
I'd be a bit careful about wishing for a too-solid drug interaction tool, because 1) the costs involved in doing the standardized tests might make some medications cost-prohibitive and 2) the ethics of carrying out such tests are shaky, imo. Let's test a bunch of drug combinations on healthy animals! (As long as no one OWNS them...it's OK. Right? Um...)
So we're basically relying on experience, and it's necessarily going to be incomplete, and take a long time to collect.
Great topic, by the way. :-)
brebis noire May 7th, 2009 02:30:29 PM
Mary, I missed your post - that is a good find...it backs up my own impression that general Internet resources are sometimes useful in these kinds of problems (I don't have access to VIN, and I get impatient with the kind of situation Dr Khuly describes, calling up experts and not getting an answer right away. I'm lucky to get answers the same week...)
brebis noire May 7th, 2009 02:33:17 PM
I think that sounds like a really fun app to build, actually, and a nice programming project. But I don't know where I'd get the info to plug into it.
Cait May 7th, 2009 04:50:00 PM
I'm curious but how did human doctors develop their drug interaction databases? Is it just experience that tells them and this is cataloged or is there some kind of science that enables one to take two (or 3 or 4) disparate drugs and pharmacokinetically predict how they'll interact?
Alex May 7th, 2009 10:19:03 PM
Mary, I've gotten incredibly good a finding multiple sources about drugs and assimilating them (thanks in large part to your website; THANK YOU) but, in the end, as everyone's saying, it's time sucking and still a crap shoot guess most of the time. Would be nice if there were at least an on line database for vets to easily report their experiences so they have access to a collective rather than each one doing their own trial and error; even nicer if there was public access just for viewing if nothing more. (You get credit for me not being the least bit shy about insisting on post op pain meds for my dog a few months ago too. Found your site before Dr. K's. :)
PJBoosinger May 7th, 2009 10:25:44 PM
Alex: Human doctors?? Are you kidding? They don't even take responsibility for drug interactions. My gosh, my Mom was on up to twelve different medications a day, not counting occasional courses of antibiotics, prescribed by : oncologist, cardiologist, pulmonary spec., neurologist, gastroenterologist....it was insanity! And not a one, would address the meds prescribed by the other, or possible negative interactions...the answer was "ask your primary care Dr."
My elderly Dad had to become the pharmacist!
Barb A./NH May 7th, 2009 10:57:46 PM
Alex, When I was young, we depended more on our pharmacist to point out issues like that because he (yes, usually a "he" in those days) knew all the drugs a person was taking, often prescribed by multiple doctors, and usually knew us on a more personal level. FDA doesn't have a handle on it, most of the databases are fee based services of varying quality, I certainly wouldn't trust the volume driven pharmacist at Wal-whatever to do it (especially when most of us go to multiple pharmacies these days). The whole issue of evaluating drugs is really new anyway http://www.fda.gov/cder/about/history/Histext.htm 1500 government employees v. the drug industry. Hmmm, think I'll do my own research.
PJBoosinger May 7th, 2009 11:36:18 PM
Alex: Great question. It's actually a combination.
For example, basic research is conducted into how the liver's enzymes break down drugs. This information helps tell us whether we can expect certain interactions based on one or more enzymes' ability to handle more than one at a time. Pharmacokinetics of individual drugs play into this calculation so that we might predict how two or more drugs handled by these enzymes might interact.
Then there's the reporting of reactions--crucial to our greater understanding of the body's processes, pinpointing the need for more specific research on this. Keeping track of these reactions happens at the level of the FDA and the individual drug companies. But getting that out to the practitioners and the public? that's not always so easy.
Ideally, we need a centralized database for these to at least help guide us better.
Dr. Patty Khuly May 8th, 2009 07:54:31 AM
I could wish for better information about interactions (and side effects) for human meds - that said, my current doctor has a lovely program that pulls up what I'm currently on, adds in whatever he's thinking of giving me, and puts a big red flag in the middle of the screen if something is going to go badly! I can certainly see how something like that would be incredibly useful for vets, Dr Khuly, but oh boy it would have to be more complicated than the human version...
Mel Redcap May 8th, 2009 07:49:36 PM
A centralised database for all of North America (ideally Europe as well) would be nice, one based on reports of adverse effects, and reactions with combinations. The different pharmaceutical companies to come together and set it up but I'm not holding my breath.
In theory, it doesn't sound very complicated, but it would require most vets being online, and entering the name of the drugs the animal is taking, the nature of the event and various details. I.e. - they'd have to know about its existence. Best way to do that would for it to be regulated. Who would take responsibility for the costs and logistics?
I'd like to think it would make a great project for a graduate student...
brebis noire May 9th, 2009 08:45:16 AM
brebis noire: Since writing this, I have heard rumors of a veterinarian in Baltimore (I think) who's got the largest database for veterinary drug interactions in the world. He's probably sitting on a tool he doesn't know how to monetize. The big drug companies or one of the online pet portals might be able to help, I would think.
Dr. Patty Khuly May 9th, 2009 05:09:30 PM
How did the veterinarian in Baltimore build his database? One way to start would be by filing a Freedom of Information request with FDA CVM for all adverse drug event reports scored as possibly or probably related to the drug and which include concomitants. In fact, since FDA CVM is receiving adverse drug event reports from the public, veterinarians, and drug companies, listing concomitants, and scoring the reports why don't they identify combos identified with high regularity in adverse event reports? That would be a start.
Jo May 14th, 2009 08:02:57 PM
. Links of London , the leading British contemporary jeweller was founded in 1990 by jewellery designer Annoushka Ducas and her husband John Ayton.cheap Links of London jewelry at online linksgif UK store, including Links of London Necklaces, Links of London Charms, Links of London Earrings. Links of London Silver Sweetie Bracelet Medium Links of London Gold jewellery will be included in the Links of London Anthology Collection, which has just been launched. The jeweller has included pendants, earrings with 18-c flanks and a necklace with an 18-c white gold chain among the items partly or wholly made from the precious metal, Elite Traveller has stated. Links of London Silver Links of London jewellery Links of London Links of London Bracelets Links of London Charms
londons May 29th, 2009 04:46:05 AM
[url=http://www.links-london.co.uk/links-of-london-rings]links of london ring[/url][url=http://www.links-london.co.uk/links-of-london-bangles]links of london bangle[/url][url=http://www.links-london.co.uk/links-of-london-necklaces]links of london necklaces[/url]
lili June 17th, 2009 11:24:28 PM
دردشة
منتديات
يوتيوب
kjhkhi June 26th, 2009 09:02:04 PM
Have you been looking for a free <a href="http://www.flash-maker.org/">Flash Maker</a> download? Please have a try with this powerful and easy-to-use Flash Maker, which is designed to make flash files from photos, it is a versatile flash file maker and flash video maker. <a href="http://www.flash-maker.org/flash-slideshow-maker.html">Flash Slideshow Maker</a>,<a href="http://www.flash-maker.org/flash-banner-maker.html">Flash Banner Maker</a>
sdfsdsd July 6th, 2009 05:34:39 AM
AAA Designer Replica Handbags & Purses nice-bags.com provides Designer Handbags of the second best quality which is almost as excellent as originals www.nice-bags.com
amysky123 July 21st, 2009 01:03:11 PM
The only ones ghd hair iron among you who will be really happy ghd mk4 iron are those who will have sought and foundhow to serve. When the fight begins ghd iv dark styler within ghd iv kiss styler himself, a man's worth something ghd hair iron .
GHD Hair Iron September 12th, 2009 04:36:03 AM
Thanks for your sharing.This is a good access to Amercrombie and Fitch
Abercrombie and Fitch September 16th, 2009 04:33:51 AM
The home is very comfortable
Links London is out of the doubt the most famous sterling silver jewelry in the world. Its unique & exquisite design, its classic and wonderful theme, and its unmatched position in silver industry fill all of us, with desire and admiration. Here present the most valued replica clothing Links of London Jewelers among hot jewelries for your reference only.
It is hard for women to resist the temptation of jewelries and women's jewelry box is like an abysm which is never full. When declaring that We do not want any Links of London Jewelers, We may throw many girls into great confusion. In respect that the personal taste and qualities will be revealed if the jewels are properly matched with the dresses. But it is hard for people to master the tips in choosing jewelries properly.
The following are some tips which are in the hope of guiding and giving aid to the choosing and matching jewelries. Great attention should be paid to the coordination of the jewelries you chose to your face, complexion, temperament, hairstyle, etc. so that you can obtain the most suitable Links of London Jewelers. The basic criteria is to choose the jewelry whose shape is neither resemble your face shape nor totally opposite your face shape.
Links of London is the everlasting expression of love. Love her; give her links of London, the token for engagement and wedding. Nothing will be more suitable and special. No hesitation, get links replica clothing London set or even a links of London inspired necklace, pendant, bracelet, earring, or ring. You are enjoying discount price at links london jewelry.
jack September 17th, 2009 03:31:43 AM
cartier jewelry
cartier jewellery
Nice October 13th, 2009 09:35:27 PM
<a href=http://www.flashreplica.com>louis vuitton</a> [url=http://www.flashreplica.com]louis vuitton[/url]
LV October 17th, 2009 02:08:10 AM
kjljlkjlkjweiruoiyweplknlk silver <a href="http://www.linksoflondonstore.com">links of london charms</a>bracelets are a modern, grown-up take on the friendship<a href="http://www.linksoflondonstore.com/links-of-london-rings">links of london ring</a> bands we made juoilkjm jiol
links October 20th, 2009 12:18:50 AM
weight loss tips
blackberry cases
coach handbags
weight loss November 3rd, 2009 01:52:15 AM
Add Commment