A veterinary blog for pet lovers, vet voyeurs and the medically curious...
Support Dolittler: Subscribe!
Search

With a deep bow to PetConnection, whose blog posts I was catching up on this morning, I feel compelled to address this timely issue: Why there are no Google ads on Dolittler.

Though I’m grateful to Google for all the traffic it sends Dolittler’s way, I will never use their AdSense service to populate this site with revenue generating advertising—not unless there’s a way for me to weed out the nasty bits…and there’s lots of unsavory material lurking in the Googly world of advetising—yuck!

Puppy peddlers, fly-by-night pet vitamin shops, online pet outlets of dubious designation, etcetera.

It’s my opinion that sites like PetPlace.com, whose medical content can be soooo good, disgrace themselves by offering their white space up to the highest bidder, regardless of its provenance.

Not only are the ads graphically unsightly, chopping up the meat of a site with the dexterity of a five year-old wielding a blunt cleaver, I think they insult my readers’ intelligence by pandering to the lowest common denominator pet person.

How can I write a post about how pet medicine is increasingly populated by cheap products and dangerous ingredients while turning a buck off the backs of my readers’ occasional forays into the world of Internet filth?

OK, so not all Google ads are bad. But there’s no easy way to control what winds up on your site. And I’m not playing that game.

Here’s what I wrote in my comment to Gina’s post explaining why Google ads don't appear on PetConnection:

This is a subject near and dear to my heart. My developers are always trying to get me to use interstitial (halfway down the page) Google ads. I keep explaining that I will not fence for scumbags. They can’t completely wrap their heads around why I’m willing to forego *free* money. As you’ve explained nicely with your examples, “free” money often comes at a hefty price—to my reputation, my readers’ having to look at the dregs the Internet has to offer, the animals being peddled…need I go on?

Comments
I gave up on Google ads because of the nasty content and aesthetics... and they don't make much money. ;)
# Posted By emily | 5/2/08 9:50 AM
I think Google has a tool to let you review / screen ads before they run now. See:

http://adsense.blogspot.com/2007/12/introducing-ad...

It still doesn't deal with the aesthetics of the ads, and I suspect pre-screened ads would generate even less money than normal adsense ads. You could try image or video ads - might be less brazen and a good tradeoff between aesthetics, pre-screening, and revenue generation.

Google's pre-screen engine is pretty new, so hard to say how well it will work. One could imagine a scenario that after you pre-screen ads and block 'bad' advertisers for a while that the ads get so relevant / good they become really useful to your readers.

If you can generate acceptable revenue with your site sponsors that is probably the best way to go to control content and minimize time investment.
# Posted By Larry | 5/2/08 10:41 AM
oops, forgot the url to review ad-types. Here it is: http://tinyurl.com/23c2ht
# Posted By Larry | 5/2/08 10:43 AM
I've heard a lot of good things in the webcomics community about the ad service Project Wonderful (http://projectwonderful.com/). One of the things I've heard about it is the complete control over who has ads on it is good.
# Posted By zandperl | 5/2/08 3:06 PM
The problem with "screening" Google ads is that it's like slapping at flies at a manure pit: You can only kill them one by one, and it becomes a full-time job to do so.

NOT WORTH IT.

Sell it elsewhere, puppy-mill scum.
# Posted By Gina Spadafori | 5/2/08 3:28 PM
I'm not a blog connoisseur, but I've always been impressed on how your blog looks. Lots of info, lots of different things, but not cluttered. And though the Google ads do bother me on an aesthetic level, I've always been more turned off on how the ads seemed so ill-suited for the subject. I figured Google was smarter than that.
# Posted By lin | 5/2/08 7:23 PM
I don't recall visiting "petplace", but my visit a few minutes ago was distracting and required "registering" before viewing an article---what's with that?

I haven't visited Petconnection often enough, with a beautiful site and layout, mainly because I am "unconnected" with the RSS feed concept. I wish it had an optional email system, such as employed by Itchmo.

Although, I guess I should just visit every day, as I do on Doolittler!!
# Posted By Barbara A. Albright/New Hampshire | 5/3/08 5:41 PM
VIRTUAL VET HOSPITAL
Got a sick pet? Visit our Virtual Vet Hospital and admit your own pets as patients in Dolittler's unique pet healthcare forum.
PODCASTS
New! Download our latest podcasts:
ARCHIVES
FAVORITE POSTS
RECOMMENDED
CAREERISTS
Did you always want to be a vet or vet technician? Thinking about it? Working on it? Need some Help?
VetInfo.com
AVMA
Miami Vet Specialist
Penn Vet School
DVM.com
VIN
Vet News Network
Vet Practice News
Vetstoria
"The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are treated."
- Mohandas Gandhi
This blog is running version 5.003.