Vet P.O.V. Gimme shelter: Justice for animals abandoned in Galveston, Texas

September 24th, 2008  

Add Comment31 Comments

You would think that evacuees, even those who typically don't let their animals indoors, would at least put them inside with food and water knowing that the storm was coming and they would never make it tied to a tree in the yard - the house will probably get trashed anyway, who cares if the dog has to pee on the carpet??

Personally, I have NO SYMPATHY for these people. If you live in an area that is likely to see these kinds of natural disasters, then you should have a plan and an emergency fund - a place where you can go, a place where your pets can go, all of your important papers etc in one place where you can grab them etc.. It is all about priorities and being prepared, and taking responsibility for the pets that YOU decided you had to have. I have no feeling at all for people who spend all their money on other things, but then when faced with disaster, cry poor and say they have no other choice but to do the things they do - or don't do. If you can't help yourself and do the right thing by your animals when faced with disasters like these, then perhaps you should move to an area where they are less likely to occur.

And the REAL problems with the abuse of animals in these situations is not so much a lack of laws, but a lack of interest in enforcing them.

jennifer September 24th, 2008 09:31:00 AM

That's terrible. The last bus was willing to take animals and yet I doubt very many actually went on the bus. I wouldn't hop on a bus without my animals!

Also for the people that drop off pets because of foreclosures or what have you, for most shelters it's an open door policy. I'm pretty sure it doesn't cost anything to drop a pet off at the shelter.

They should be prosecuted for this. No animal can defend itself during a hurricane and especially when they're trapped on an island.

ashleigh September 24th, 2008 09:42:00 AM

It is despicable that some people keep reacting so poorly in times of crisis. I can't imagine being so heartless to leave a defenseless animal behind when fleeing a storm, but some seem to shut down their ability to reason when tragedies hit.

I wonder if the response of outside animal rescue groups actually makes prosecution of these laws less likely. Those teams take on a tremendous animal welfare burden while local authorities deal with infrastructure and reconstruction challenges. Maybe if the non-profits billed the cities/state for their work the cities/state would have an incentive to enforce the animal cruelty laws. Even just the PR from that move might move the needle enough to encourage enforcement.

Neil September 24th, 2008 10:47:00 AM

They would be required to:
1. Be chained to a tree in a very public place for a 24 hr period, with no food or water, and a 5 min bathroom break every 4 hrs. They would wear a sign around their neck, saying "I'm an irresponsible pet owner," or something like that.
2. Attend animal cruelty education classes.
3. Complete 50 hrs of community service at a local animal shelter, with no contact with the animals. Their duties would include cleaning kennels and cat boxes, washing dishes, etc., and laundry.

I figure that a money fine wouldn't do much good, as they would likely cry that they don't have the funds. So, I'd go for public humiliation and education.

Jandela September 24th, 2008 10:59:00 AM

This kind of thing is so heartbreaking. Just an extreme on the continuum of behaviors of people who shouldn't have pets. As with dogs neglected on chains in yards all the time, with no attention; cats left outdoors to fend for themselves, un-neutered and un-vetted--I will never be able to comprehend why these people have animals in the first place if that is all they mean to them. My cats are like family; I can't imagine being able to leave them behind with such a threat coming. Especially considering the (relatively) lengthy warning time that is nearly always the case with a hurricane.

I don't know how much difference enforcement of cruelty laws would make, but it seems to be all we have that might make a statement to the people who are so careless.

Judy September 24th, 2008 11:17:00 AM

One of my ferrets was found in a house for sale by a realtor and turned into the MSPCA, from where he made his way to a ferret shelter and ultimately to me. No natural disasters or any other pseudo-excuses, the former owners just left him in his cage in an empty house. How hard would it have been to even just leave him on a vet or shelter's doorstep in the middle of the night, if the people couldn't be bothered to formally surrender him? It just makes me so angry to think of this sweet guy left like that. It probably wouldn't have been too hard to track down and prosecute the former owners, but the MSPCA has limited resources and needs to focus on the severe cases, so they get away free. Luckily this one came out all right in the end, but if nobody had wanted to see the house for a couple of weeks...

regina September 24th, 2008 11:18:00 AM

It´s sad that pets are, and have always been, to a lot people like "property" (and when it comes, for example, to travelling with pets, legally, they ARE property!) and can be discarded when a spot of trouble hits. Storms and impending natural disasters are the worst I think because for most animals it´s *certain* death, whereas, if "simply" abandoned at other times, at least they have a chance to fend for themselves or get help from the good people in this world.

I have seen it so many times in the place where I live (a small Spanish-ruled island off the West Coast of Africa), when people leave to go back to live in the UK - because the UK is the only country in Europe that has the 6 month quarantine rule (albeit at home now instead of 6 months in a kennel like it was before). Hence the British, who are supposed to be the biggest animal loving community on this island, are also the worst for abandoning them when it comes to the crunch, simply because they´re too lazy, or feel it´s "too much hassle" to do the 6 month preparation for travel of the pet. The second biggest communities here are German and Scandinavian and it doesn´t happen with them, because they don´t have the quarantine restrictions.

I am German but have lived in the UK for 20 years and if I ever had to go back and live in the UK I could NEVER, for any reason, just dump my 3 cats. They are *family*. If anything, I would STAY and just not go back. This might sound extreme, but if I could not take my 3 cats and a hurricane was coming this way, I would NOT leave. I would not abandon my babies. But maybe I´m in the minority here with that view?

Barbarella Buchner September 24th, 2008 12:06:00 PM

I do not condone leaving a pet behind under ANY circumstances. Heck, I'd live in my car with my cats (and yes, it would not be pretty) before Id abandon them.

But part of me sees the feelings behind "shelters" and how most lay people feel if they bring their pet to a shelter it will be immediately put to sleep. They can't face that. They'd rather believe that their kitty or puppy or ferret will be found by the realtor, or the new home owner and be adopted and loved. Or if they put them out on the street they'll be able to fend for themselves and there for the human being wouldn't be responsible for their death.

We need more education, more news stories, more publicity about what happens to these pets. People just don't get it. They don't see the rail thin starving pets who suffer immensly because they have no idea how to fend for themselves (if my cat ever caught a mouse I'd be looking for the second coming) They don't know how hard it is for pets to come back from that, and how many don't. Even those of us who watch Animal Cops and see the starving animals, we watch a very glossed over picture of their recovery "yes, we fed them, and now they are fine" Maybe some do recover that well, but some don't.

I too think people need to be prosecuted. I don't care about poverty or circumstances. You agreed to care for this pet, you need to care for this pet. Period. I hate how people simply claim the pet isn't theirs (oh I've been feeding this stray for years, but it's not mine!) and they get away with it.

I like the idea of public humiliation. There was a woman, Michelle Murray, in OH who was sentanced very similary. It should happen more often.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1118052park1....

Connie September 24th, 2008 12:41:00 PM

While I don't have anything constructive to say, I just wanted to point out that as a Texan, I would hear on the radio animal shelters (as in ASPCA, Humane Society) advertising that they were willing to hold people's animals (not adopt out or euth - actually hold) at no cost to them - free boarding. This was advertised a week before the storm hit, and then for several days after! Fort Worth had the biggest campaign I can recall.

It makes me sick that people do that crap, it really does, especially when there ARE options available.

spazzy September 24th, 2008 12:42:00 PM

There is no way I would ever abandon my cats like that. If I couldn't find a place to go I would stay with them. They are my family, my best friends, my soul mates. However, I wonder...I don't live near any of these areas, but disasters can strike where you don't expect it. Let's say some chemical dump forced evacuation or some other type of natural disaster. So, these are just questions....besides obviously tagging the pets if they are lost, what are the options if I don't want to be parted from my cats? Shelters that take people don't take pets do they? Hotels don't take pets usually.....so are there some other options if you don't have friends or family out of the disaster area but close enough to make car travel possible. Is living in my car the only option I would have if I faced this situation? Or calling 100 vets and boarders to see if they can board someplace, which is doubtful. I don't see turning my cats over to a big shelter - they would be scared, might get sick, etc.... Are there any good options out there?

Jenny September 24th, 2008 02:17:00 PM

This is heartbreaking....

Creature of Habit September 24th, 2008 02:59:00 PM

As a Texan, I am saddened. Katrina taught the world that leaving pets behind should never be an option in an evacuation. Ike is teaching the world that even when provisions are made, people still don't care, only this time it's the pet owners, not the officials in charge of the evacuations.

I am a vet tech in a small animal practice, as well as part-time at an emergency clinic. I also have spent many years doing breed specific rescue and fostering (Corgis) as well as multi-breed shelter pulls and transports. I've seen the worst of the worst in shelters and accepted many owner surrenders for a multitude of reasons and I have always tried to be non-judgmental. While I may always think things to myself when an owner refuses to treat their pet and in certain circumstances elects to euthanize, or surrenders them to me because they've had a baby and don't have time for the pet any longer; I never openly judge them and always treated them with respect.

But these people in Galveston. I am judging and I have no respect. Every provision was made for them to be able to take their pets with them and not have to abandon them, yet they did anyway.

Unfortunately in Texas, pets are considered property, and it's difficult to have the desired outcome when pets are abandoned or not treated appropriately.

I firmly believe the first step, is to change the way pets are viewed in the eyes of the law. Until that happens, nothing will be done to pet owners in these circumstances and they know it.

Personally, I'd take every one of them, and lock them in an animal shelter for an extended period of time. Or abandon them on an island somewhere they are unable to escape from, with no food, water or shelter, taking away everything they have or know. Let them be treated just like the pet they abandoned.

Probably wouldn't change anything, but it would make me feel better.

Kim September 24th, 2008 03:19:00 PM

Kim: I agree. But I'll add another point. Pets are property across the US--but they still have special rights under the law. Unlike traditional property (like your toaster oven, for example), pets cannot be treated cruelly. The law does have provisions for cruel treatment but that doesn't mean any DA anywhere in the US is willing to enforce these laws. It's only the most egregious active animal cruelty (hitting animal with a bat in your front yard in front of the neighbors, for example) that ever gets prosecuted. negligence just doesn't get the same due.

Dr. Patty Khuly September 24th, 2008 03:25:00 PM

I could understand Katrina. People were told they couldn't bring their pets with them. They thought they'd be back home in a couple of days.

But there's no excuse this time. People were encouraged to take their pets. Places to drop your pets off were in place. People were told that the area would be devestated and they wouldn't be back in quickly.

Not only should they be prosecuted, they should be spayed and neutered because anyone unable to take care of a pet, is not parent material.

2CatMom September 24th, 2008 04:38:00 PM

Inexcusable, atrocious, and pitiful on behalf of humans. Where does the talk of "property" enter this picture. Most states and federal laws recognize forms of "animal cruelty" , this is one of them!

Identifying pictures should be taken that reveal locations of these animals tethered and helpless, or dead. Prosecution and enforcement of the law.

About 15 or so years ago, in mid-winter, we had a scary chimney fire. Immediately, after calling the Fire Dept., we grabbed our most precious possessions to bring to safety. That's right, we evacuated our pets and put them safely in our cars, and then awaited the fire truck arrival. Nothing else was grabbed or gone back for.

Fortunately, the fire was contained to the chimney and safely extinguished. (have you ever 'heard' one? sounds like a train speeding thru your house!!)

Barbara A. Albright/New Hampshire September 24th, 2008 05:40:00 PM

Jenny,
Where I live there was recently a propane explosion that forced the evacuation of a huge swath of land and approximately 16000 people. One of our local universities served as the emergency shelter and pets were welcome. All of them, dogs, cats, hamsters whatever. One woman who owns two pit bulls who are actually outlawed here and are not to be in public without leashes and muzzles wasn't able to grab either in the evacuation and was still allowed to bring her dogs with her into the shelter where they were provided with water and food.

My two cents about this story. Treat the people who abandoned their pets the way they treated their pets. Tie them up, leave them with no food and water and let them fight for their lives in a hurricane.

And my own experience. I woke up one night last summer pulling a pillowcase off my pillow, absolutely conviced that my house was on fire. At the time I had my own cat, a foster cat and my mom's 100 lb dog. My first and only thought was to get myself and them out safely. The cats get stuffed into a pillowcase, the exicited dog clipped to his leash and I was outside of the house before I was awake enough to wonder where the smoke and flames were. If I couldn't take my pets in the event of an evacuation, I simply wouldn't go. And legally no one can make me.

Shannon September 24th, 2008 05:52:00 PM

Barbara,

Dogs are considered property. And, while there are laws regarding cruelty and abuse, you'll be hard pressed to get anywhere in court for abandoning them. If you could, the jails and prisons would be overflowing.

That is why the laws pertaining to animals needs to be revised, so they are not just property to treat as you wish, with no repercussions. So that neglect or abandoning them are no longer overlooked by the law.

As Dr Khuly stated, it's only the most horrific cruelty that ever is prosecuted, which usually only happens because the media gets involved and they are forced to.

If I were King of Texas, you'd best bet I'd start by making an example out of the individuals that abandoned their pets, then work on getting the laws changed, so anyone in the future that leaves their dog tied in the backyard when they moved out or gets tired of their cat and dumps it on a deserted road, or any of the 100's of other things you and I considered abuse, but currently isn't looked upon as being serious enough to prosecute, IS prosecuted.

It's an idealistic dream, and I hope I am around to see it finally happen.

Kim September 24th, 2008 06:51:00 PM

If I were the King of Texas- I would have an emergency animal evacuation plan in place. This storm had some lead time. People could bring their pets to a designated location, they would be chipped then and there, crated and transported inland. All the shelters in a 1000 mile radius could send their trucks, transport back to the shelter- then return the pets after the storm. I'm sure I'm not the only one who wonders why a system like this is not in place. As King of Texas, I'd mandate all shelters and ask rescue groups to participate. I'd give incentives. Too bad it won't work in my area- as we'll have no warning for the big earthquake that is about to flatten us all!
Victoria

victoria September 24th, 2008 06:52:00 PM

Compulsory microchipping, that is kept up to date when the owner moves. At least you could link a pet to an owner, even if it took a while.

More rescue centres, so they are not always full and have to turn people away. Accepting all animals, no matter what type.

Education - pets are for life. Pets are part of the family. Would you dump your child or tie them to a tree? Pets are not like motorcycles that you can just ignore when you can no longer maintain them.

Robin September 24th, 2008 07:19:00 PM

Robin,

Those are all great ideas, but what happens to the owners that don't microchip or change their address?I don't want to rain on your idea, but if we can't get individuals prosecuted for abuse or neglect , how are we going to get them prosecuted when they fail to microchip their pet or change their address when they move?

Of course the responsible pet owners will follow the rules, but it's not the responsible pet owners abandoning their pets.

I do agree there needs to be pet education and rescue centers. It's the funding for those things that is hard to come by :)

Kim September 24th, 2008 07:36:00 PM

Yep, in an ideal world, and all that. Enforcement is the problem too, at least in these parts. Enforcement for lots of dog laws, not just microchipping.

Robin September 24th, 2008 10:33:00 PM

The thing I worry about is that people with less money are less able to make plans ahead of time, or to care for animals in a time of crisis. Does this mean that people with less money shouldn't be allowed to have pets? These same people would have more difficulty caring for children in a time of crisis, and yet we don't say that poor people should be forbidden from having children - we only prosecute when it does happen that people (regardless of income level) mistreat the children. I don't think there's any fair way to legally prevent this sort of thing, other than just a public information campaign.

zandperl September 24th, 2008 10:44:00 PM

That wasn't the impression I got from the news clips. To me it appeared that people took along pets regardless of economic status, even during katrina.
People & pets were boarding buses---not just driving out in expensive cars. The plan in place provided for this combined evacuation.

I couldn't abandon one of my pets any more than I could abandon an elderly, ill, or young human family member, as most of us on this blog.

Barbara A. Albright/New Hampshire September 24th, 2008 11:06:00 PM

Victoria, you said:

"I'd mandate all shelters and ask rescue groups to participate."

Well, and why shouldn´t they? Shelters and rescue groups help humans during a disaster, so why NOT the animals too? It´s simply the way it *should* be. And yes, in an ideal world!

Barbarella Buchner September 25th, 2008 04:20:00 AM

Zandperl,
I don't think its an economic thing at all. You either love and hold yourself responsible for your pets or you don't. If you truly care, you'd find a way.

I have two cats and have been a student for the last several years making oh about A$20 000 a year. My evacuation plan includes a bag packed with bottled water, my cats medication, important phone numbers and other info (such as bank and insurance stuff), a spare set of keys, a small first aid kit, food for myself and them as well as a can opener that would sustain us for a few days. I have arrangements with various family members as to places I would go if I needed to go and I have carriers here for all my cats (my two + one foster) but in case of emergency I would probably use pillow cases just because I wouldn't be able to carry three carriers myself.

My point, its not a money thing, its a preparation thing and what I've done doesn't cost any money at all to put together.

Shannon

Shannon September 25th, 2008 09:51:00 AM

Shannon, you said:

"My point, its not a money thing, its a preparation thing and what I've done doesn't cost any money at all to put together."

This is true, I agree. It really doesn´t cost anything to save your animals along with the rest of your family.

Barbarella September 25th, 2008 10:11:00 AM

A guy I know said "If the numbers of available pets could be decreased so that they had more 'value' then maybe people would think they were worth making an effort for." I thought for a moment he might have had a point (supply and demand economics), but then I thought of the idiots who pay outrageous amounts of money for a 'designer' breed ("How about we get a Havapoo, honey?") MUTT and then don't take care of it either. It really is the particular way of thinking that is so foreign to most of the readers of this blog.
The saddest thing is that it seems that now, with the Houston shelters overloaded from the Galveston animals, they have no room and resources for animals needing help who actually are in Houston. I do think that the numbers of animals going down through mandatory spay and neuter could eventually (I know it seems to raise shelter kills for a time) help out. But, that's just not the American way to a certain segment of the population. "I want what I want and I don't care who or what it hurts so I can get it - and when I don't want it anymore, it's not my problem any more."

Kate September 25th, 2008 01:10:00 PM

Kate said:

"But, that's just not the American way to a certain segment of the population. "I want what I want and I don't care who or what it hurts so I can get it - and when I don't want it anymore, it's not my problem any more." "

It´s not just the American way, it´s the "human way", sadly. This happens just about everywhere. :(

Barbarella Buchner September 25th, 2008 01:15:00 PM

Hear hear! If I were Queen of Texas, I would make all of these people pay to house their animals in shelters while new, loving homes are found, and bar them from owning animals again. They would also have to pay for any and all rescue efforts, because a lot of the time there are people in these houses with the animals, too stubborn to leave.

Morgan September 26th, 2008 01:18:00 PM

If I were queen of Texas, I'd:

-see these cases were prosecuted where possible

-change the status of pets so that they are treated under the law more like children

-anyone found guilty of animal neglect/cruelty would have their children taken away and would be barred from having pets or children ever again. (This is real pie-in-the-sky, I know.)

-make sure law enforcement and other state agencies would cooperate with animal rescue groups and even the state's own animal control agencies.

Jen M. September 27th, 2008 10:37:00 PM

I am a native Houstonian, and I understand your plight, without objection. Unfortunately, there is little we can do as a preventative measure. NOW, however, we are stuck with broke shelters begging communities for money, supplies, kitty littler, adoptions, fosters, etc. While the communities are pulling together to help-I live in Conroe(North of Houston), and our shelter animals rode out the storm and were without power or electricity (including A/C) for five days-most are hospitalized. On top of that, the shelter took in as many IKE evacuations as possible, and the shelter's resources are depleted. If you can find it in your heart to donate, and to pass this message along, all of the area shelters are in need. Please see this website as is the closest shelter to where I live:
http://fmctas.org

Thank you!

Kara September 30th, 2008 05:27:00 PM

Add Commment

Your Name:

CAPTCHA Verification